Literature DB >> 15857521

Evolution of the medical practices and modes of death on pediatric intensive care units in southern Brazil.

Délio José Kipper1, Jefferson Pedro Piva, Pedro Celiny Ramos Garcia, Paulo Roberto Einloft, Francisco Bruno, Patrícia Lago, Taís Rocha, Alaor Ernst Schein, Patrícia Scolari Fontela, Débora Hendler Gava, Luciano Guerra, Keli Chemello, Roney Bittencourt, Simone Sudbrack, Evandro Freddy Mulinari, João Feliz Duarte Morais.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To study the possible change on mode of deaths, medical decision practices, and family participation on decisions for limiting life-sustaining treatments (L-LST) over a period of 13 yrs in three pediatric intensive care units (PICUs) located in southern Brazil.
METHODS: A cross-sectional study based on a retrospective chart review (1988 and 1998) and on prospective data collection (from May 1999 to May 2000).
SETTING: Three PICUs in Porto Alegre, southern Brazilian region. PATIENTS: Children who died in those PICUs during the years of 1988, 1998, and between May 1999 and May 2000.
RESULTS: The 3 PICUs admitted 6,233 children during the study period with a mortality rate of 9.2% (575 deaths), and 509 (88.5%) medical charts were evaluated in this study. Full measures for life support (F-CPR) were recognized in 374 (73.5%) children before dying, brain death (BD) was diagnosed in 43 (8.4%), and 92 (18.1%) underwent some limitation of life support treatment (L-LST) There were 140 (27.5%) deaths within the first 24 hrs of admission and 128 of them (91.4%) received F-CPR, whereas just 11 (7.9%) patients underwent L-LST. The average length of stay for the death group submitted to F-CPR was lower (3 days) than the L-LST group (8.5 days; p < .05). The rate of F-CPR before death decreased significantly between 1988 (89.1%) and 1999/2000 (60.8%), whereas the L-LST rose in this period from 6.2% to 31.3%. These changes were not uniform among the three PICUs, with different rates of L-LST (p < .05). The families were involved in the decision-making process for L-LST in 35.9% of the cases, increasing from 12.5% in 1988 to 48.6% in 1999/2000. The L-LST plans were recorded in the medical charts in 76.1% of the deaths, increasing from 50.0% in 1988 to 95.9% in 1999/2000.
CONCLUSION: We observed that the modes of deaths in southern Brazilian PICUs changed over the last 13 yrs, with an increment in L-LST. However, this change was not uniform among the studied PICUs and did not reach the levels described in countries of the Northern Hemisphere. Family participation in the L-LST decision-making process has increased over time, but it is still far behind what is observed in other parts of the world.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Death and Euthanasia; Empirical Approach

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15857521     DOI: 10.1097/01.PCC.0000154958.71041.37

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med        ISSN: 1529-7535            Impact factor:   3.624


  18 in total

1.  End-of-life care in Brazil.

Authors:  Márcio Soares; Renato G G Terzi; Jefferson P Piva
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2007-04-05       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  End of life care in Brazil: the long and winding road.

Authors:  Márcio Soares
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 9.097

3.  Forgoing life support: how the decision is made in European pediatric intensive care units.

Authors:  Denis J Devictor; Jos M Latour
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Prevalence of questioning regarding life-sustaining treatment and time utilisation by forgoing treatment in francophone PICUs.

Authors:  Robin Cremer; Philippe Hubert; Bruno Grandbastien; Grégoire Moutel; Francis Leclerc
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2011-08-16       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Epidemiology of childhood death in Australian and New Zealand intensive care units.

Authors:  Katie M Moynihan; Peta M A Alexander; Luregn J Schlapbach; Johnny Millar; Stephen Jacobe; Hari Ravindranathan; Elizabeth J Croston; Steven J Staffa; Jeffrey P Burns; Ben Gelbart
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Are the GFRUP's recommendations for withholding or withdrawing treatments in critically ill children applicable? Results of a two-year survey.

Authors:  R Cremer; A Binoche; O Noizet; C Fourier; S Leteurtre; G Moutel; F Leclerc
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.903

7.  Performance of the pediatric index of mortality 2 (PIM-2) in cardiac and mixed intensive care units in a tertiary children's referral hospital in Italy.

Authors:  Marta Luisa Ciofi degli Atti; Marina Cuttini; Lucilla Ravà; Silvia Rinaldi; Carla Brusco; Paola Cogo; Nicola Pirozzi; Sergio Picardo; Franco Schiavi; Massimiliano Raponi
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 2.125

8.  Respiratory support withdrawal in intensive care units: families, physicians and nurses views on two hypothetical clinical scenarios.

Authors:  Renata R L Fumis; Daniel Deheinzelin
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2010-12-29       Impact factor: 9.097

9.  Circumstances surrounding dying in the paediatric intensive care unit.

Authors:  Jetske ten Berge; Dana-Anne H de Gast-Bakker; Frans B Plötz
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2006-08-07       Impact factor: 2.125

10.  End-of-Life Practices Among Tertiary Care PICUs in the United States: A Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Kathleen L Meert; Linda Keele; Wynne Morrison; Robert A Berg; Heidi Dalton; Christopher J L Newth; Rick Harrison; David L Wessel; Thomas Shanley; Joseph Carcillo; Amy Clark; Richard Holubkov; Tammara L Jenkins; Allan Doctor; J Michael Dean; Murray Pollack
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 3.624

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.