| Literature DB >> 15856662 |
Andrea Hickle1, Jean Forster, DeAnn Lazovich, Paul Allwood, Natania Remba, Jessica Grossmeier, Glorian Sorensen.
Abstract
In spite of health risks, indoor tanning is a popular practice and a growing industry. Although published studies indicate that tanning businesses' compliance with regulations is poor, no studies describe enforcement activity and the related knowledge and perceptions of environmental health professionals. As part of a larger study of indoor tanning in Minnesota and Massachusetts, both states with statutes that regulate tanning, the investigation reported in this paper involved interviews of 27 sanitarians in the Twin Cities and 30 sanitarians in the Boston metropolitan area about their awareness, experiences, and practices. Overall, Massachusetts performed better than Minnesota with respect to familiarity with regulations (93 percent versus 67 percent), routine business inspections (90 percent of agencies versus 27 percent), and priority given by agencies to indoor-tanning work-differences likely attributable to a stronger state statute. Participants in both states, however, recalled few aspects of the regulations and were able to identify few of the health risks associated with indoor tanning, and most reported receiving inadequate training. Various steps must be taken to improve environmental health work with tanning businesses, including educating the public, strengthening regulations, addressing resource issues, and training sanitarians.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2005 PMID: 15856662
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Environ Health ISSN: 0022-0892 Impact factor: 1.179