Literature DB >> 15856554

Forecasting changes in amphibian biodiversity: aiming at a moving target.

James P Collins1, Tim Halliday.   

Abstract

Amphibian population declines and sudden species' extinctions began to be noted at the beginning of the 1980s. Understanding the causes of the losses is hampered by our poor knowledge of the amphibian fauna in many parts of the world. Amphibian taxa are still being described at a high rate, especially in the tropics, which means that even quantifying species lost as a percentage of the current fauna can be a misleading statistic in some parts of the globe. The number of species that have gone missing is only one measure of the loss of biodiversity. Long-term studies of single-species populations are needed, but this approach has its limits. Amphibian populations often show great annual variation in population size making it difficult, if not impossible, to use short-term studies as a basis for deciding if a population is increasing or decreasing in the long term. Aggregating single studies into databases and searching for patterns of variation is a way of overcoming this limitation. Several databases on species and population time series are available or in development. These records show that declines are continuing worldwide with some species and populations, especially in the tropics and at higher elevations, at greater risk of extinction than others. Unfortunately, amphibian databases with population time series have much less information for the tropics compared to the temperate zone, and less for Africa and Asia compared with Europe and North America. Focusing limited resources using comprehensive statistical designs is a way to maximize the efficiency and effectiveness of monitoring efforts. It is clear that, in the first decades of the twenty-first century, the regions of the globe with the highest diversity of amphibian species will experience the greatest rates of decrease of forests and increase in human population size, fertilizer use, agricultural production, creation of new croplands and irrigation. Many of these changes are likely negatively to affect amphibian species diversity, and their influence must be understood before concluding, at least for amphibians, that the 2010 millennium assessment goal of significantly reversing the rate of loss of Earth's biodiversity can be met.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15856554      PMCID: PMC1569460          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2004.1588

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  12 in total

1.  Quantitative evidence for global amphibian population declines.

Authors:  J E Houlahan; C S Findlay; B R Schmidt; A H Meyer; S L Kuzmin
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-04-13       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Why are there so many new amphibian species when amphibians are declining?

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 17.712

3.  Ecology. Global amphibian population declines.

Authors:  R A Alford; P M Dixon; J H Pechmann
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-08-02       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Interactions of climate change with biological invasions and land use in the Hawaiian Islands: Modeling the fate of endemic birds using a geographic information system.

Authors:  Tracy L Benning; Dennis LaPointe; Carter T Atkinson; Peter M Vitousek
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-10-08       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Sri Lanka: an amphibian hot spot.

Authors:  M Meegaskumbura; F Bossuyt; R Pethiyagoda; K Manamendra-Arachchi; M Bahir; M C Milinkovitch; C J Schneider
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-10-11       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Status and trends of amphibian declines and extinctions worldwide.

Authors:  Simon N Stuart; Janice S Chanson; Neil A Cox; Bruce E Young; Ana S L Rodrigues; Debra L Fischman; Robert W Waller
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-10-14       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Taxonomic inflation: its influence on macroecology and conservation.

Authors:  Nick J B Isaac; James Mallet; Georgina M Mace
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 17.712

8.  Declining amphibian populations: the problem of separating human impacts from natural fluctuations.

Authors:  J H Pechmann; D E Scott; R D Semlitsch; J P Caldwell; L J Vitt; J W Gibbons
Journal:  Science       Date:  1991-08-23       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Flightless birds: when did the dodo become extinct?

Authors:  David L Roberts; Andrew R Solow
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-11-20       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  The conservation status of the herpetofauna of Honduras.

Authors:  Larry David Wilson; James R McCranie
Journal:  Amphib Reptile Conserv       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 1.322

View more
  4 in total

1.  The 2010 challenge: data availability, information needs and extraterrestrial insights.

Authors:  Andrew Balmford; Peter Crane; Andy Dobson; Rhys E Green; Georgina M Mace
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2005-02-28       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Combined effects of atrazine and chlorpyrifos on susceptibility of the tiger salamander to Ambystoma tigrinum virus.

Authors:  Jacob L Kerby; Andrew Storfer
Journal:  Ecohealth       Date:  2009-05-05       Impact factor: 3.184

3.  Putting beta-diversity on the map: broad-scale congruence and coincidence in the extremes.

Authors:  Meghan W McKnight; Peter S White; Robert I McDonald; John F Lamoreux; Wes Sechrest; Robert S Ridgely; Simon N Stuart
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 8.029

4.  Underestimation of species richness in neotropical frogs revealed by mtDNA analyses.

Authors:  Antoine Fouquet; André Gilles; Miguel Vences; Christian Marty; Michel Blanc; Neil J Gemmell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-10-31       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.