OBJECTIVE: Dyslipidemia is a preventable major risk factor for coronary heart disease (CHD). Despite an increased risk of CHD in type 1 diabetes, little is known concerning awareness and adequacy of dyslipidemia treatment in this population. In this report, we describe the prevalence of dyslipidemia and adequacy of pharmacological treatment in patients with type 1 diabetes and comparable nondiabetic subjects. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: From 2000 to 2002, the Coronary Artery Calcification in Type 1 Diabetes study obtained fasting lipid profiles in 1,416 individuals aged 19-56 years with no history of CHD: 652 type 1 diabetic patients (46% men, mean age 37 +/- 9 years) and 764 nondiabetic control subjects (50% men, mean age 39 +/- 9 years). These data combined with patient questionnaire results were used to determine prevalence of dyslipidemia and adequacy of pharmacological treatment. For all subjects, dyslipidemia was defined using National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III criteria. RESULTS: Type 1 diabetic subjects had significantly less dyslipidemia than nondiabetic control subjects (47 vs. 58%, P < 0.001), and a higher percentage of those with abnormal lipids were aware of (52 vs. 34%, P < 0.0001), on medication for (36 vs. 9%, P < 0.0001), and in control of their lipid levels (15 vs. 1.4%, P < 0.001). Of those on treatment, control was achieved in 41% of type 1 diabetic subjects and 15% of nondiabetic participants (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Dyslipidemia, a major risk factor for CHD, remains largely undiagnosed and undertreated in high-risk populations, such as patients with type 1 diabetes.
OBJECTIVE:Dyslipidemia is a preventable major risk factor for coronary heart disease (CHD). Despite an increased risk of CHD in type 1 diabetes, little is known concerning awareness and adequacy of dyslipidemia treatment in this population. In this report, we describe the prevalence of dyslipidemia and adequacy of pharmacological treatment in patients with type 1 diabetes and comparable nondiabetic subjects. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: From 2000 to 2002, the Coronary Artery Calcification in Type 1 Diabetes study obtained fasting lipid profiles in 1,416 individuals aged 19-56 years with no history of CHD: 652 type 1 diabeticpatients (46% men, mean age 37 +/- 9 years) and 764 nondiabetic control subjects (50% men, mean age 39 +/- 9 years). These data combined with patient questionnaire results were used to determine prevalence of dyslipidemia and adequacy of pharmacological treatment. For all subjects, dyslipidemia was defined using National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III criteria. RESULTS: Type 1 diabetic subjects had significantly less dyslipidemia than nondiabetic control subjects (47 vs. 58%, P < 0.001), and a higher percentage of those with abnormal lipids were aware of (52 vs. 34%, P < 0.0001), on medication for (36 vs. 9%, P < 0.0001), and in control of their lipid levels (15 vs. 1.4%, P < 0.001). Of those on treatment, control was achieved in 41% of type 1 diabetic subjects and 15% of nondiabetic participants (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS:Dyslipidemia, a major risk factor for CHD, remains largely undiagnosed and undertreated in high-risk populations, such as patients with type 1 diabetes.
Authors: David M Maahs; Nancy A West; Jean M Lawrence; Elizabeth J Mayer-Davis Journal: Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 4.741
Authors: Philip Ljunggren; David M Maahs; Per Johansson; Johnny Ludvigsson; Laura Pyle; Rachel Sippl; R Paul Wadwa; Janet Snell-Bergeon Journal: J Diabetes Complications Date: 2016-03-11 Impact factor: 2.852
Authors: Elbert S Huang; Michael O'Grady; Anirban Basu; Aaron Winn; Priya John; Joyce Lee; David Meltzer; Craig Kollman; Lori Laffel; William Tamborlane; Stuart Weinzimer; Tim Wysocki Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2010-03-23 Impact factor: 17.152
Authors: Ana Catarina Rezende Leite; Tiago Gomes Araújo; Bruno de Melo Carvalho; Maria Bernadete Souza Maia; Vera Lúcia de Menezes Lima Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med Date: 2010-09-19 Impact factor: 2.629
Authors: David M Maahs; John E Hokanson; Hong Wang; Gregory L Kinney; Janet K Snell-Bergeon; Ashley East; Bryan C Bergman; Irene E Schauer; Marian Rewers; Robert H Eckel Journal: Diabetes Date: 2010-04-14 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: John Guy; Lorraine Ogden; R Paul Wadwa; Richard F Hamman; Elizabeth J Mayer-Davis; Angela D Liese; Ralph D'Agostino; Santica Marcovina; Dana Dabelea Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2008-12-17 Impact factor: 19.112