Literature DB >> 15855385

Influence of genetic background on daily running-wheel activity differs with aging.

Michael J Turner1, Steven R Kleeberger, J Timothy Lightfoot.   

Abstract

In humans, physical activity declines with age. We tested the hypothesis that genetic background and age interact to determine daily wheel-running physical activity patterns in mice. Five female mice from ten inbred strains (A/J, AKR/J, Balb/cJ, CBA/J, C3H/HeJ, C3Heb/FeJ, C57Bl/6J, C57L/J, DBA/2J, and SWR/J) were studied for 26 wk starting at 10 wk of age. All mice were housed in separate cages, each with a running wheel and magnetic sensor. Throughout the 26-wk period, age-related change in daily duration (P < 0.0001), daily distance (P < 0.0001), and average velocity (P = 0.0003) differed between the inbred strains. Unlike the other strains, SWR/J mice increased their running-wheel activity throughout the 6-mo time period. Broad-sense heritability estimations for the strains across the 26-wk period ranged between 0.410 and 0.855 for the three physical activity phenotypes. Furthermore, the broad-sense heritability estimates for daily running-wheel distance differed across time and suggested an interaction between genetic background and age on physical activity in these inbred mice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15855385     DOI: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00243.2004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Genomics        ISSN: 1094-8341            Impact factor:   3.107


  45 in total

1.  Strain screen and haplotype association mapping of wheel running in inbred mouse strains.

Authors:  J Timothy Lightfoot; Larry Leamy; Daniel Pomp; Michael J Turner; Anthony A Fodor; Amy Knab; Robert S Bowen; David Ferguson; Trudy Moore-Harrison; Alicia Hamilton
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2010-06-10

2.  Physical exercise attenuates MPTP-induced deficits in mice.

Authors:  Trevor Archer; Anders Fredriksson
Journal:  Neurotox Res       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 3.911

3.  Altered left ventricular performance in aging physically active mice with an ankle sprain injury.

Authors:  Michael J Turner; Sophie Guderian; Erik A Wikstrom; Joshua R Huot; Bailey D Peck; Susan T Arthur; Joseph S Marino; Tricia Hubbard-Turner
Journal:  Age (Dordr)       Date:  2016-01-23

Review 4.  Driven to be inactive? The genetics of physical activity.

Authors:  Trudy Moore-Harrison; J Timothy Lightfoot
Journal:  Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.622

5.  Current understanding of the genetic basis for physical activity.

Authors:  J Timothy Lightfoot
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 4.798

6.  Retention of sedentary obese visceral white adipose tissue phenotype with intermittent physical activity despite reduced adiposity.

Authors:  Katherine S Wainright; Nicholas J Fleming; Joe L Rowles; Rebecca J Welly; Terese M Zidon; Young-Min Park; T'Keaya L Gaines; Rebecca J Scroggins; Emily K Anderson-Baucum; Alyssa H Hasty; Victoria J Vieira-Potter; Jaume Padilla
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 3.619

7.  Differential skeletal muscle proteome of high- and low-active mice.

Authors:  David P Ferguson; Lawrence J Dangott; Emily E Schmitt; Heather L Vellers; J Timothy Lightfoot
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2014-02-06

8.  Genetic variation for body weight change in mice in response to physical exercise.

Authors:  Larry J Leamy; Daniel Pomp; J Timothy Lightfoot
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2009-09-21       Impact factor: 2.797

Review 9.  Does the difference between physically active and couch potato lie in the dopamine system?

Authors:  Amy M Knab; J Timothy Lightfoot
Journal:  Int J Biol Sci       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 6.580

10.  Effect of intraperitoneal radiotelemetry instrumentation on voluntary wheel running and surgical recovery in mice.

Authors:  Bryan G Helwig; Jermaine A Ward; Michael D Blaha; Lisa R Leon
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.232

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.