Literature DB >> 15855372

The detection of loose bodies in the elbow: the value of MRI and CT arthrography.

J H Dubberley1, K J Faber, S D Patterson, G Garvin, J Bennett, W Romano, J C MacDermid, G J W King.   

Abstract

Our aim was to determine the clinical value of MRI and CT arthrography in predicting the presence of loose bodies in the elbow. A series of 26 patients with mechanical symptoms in the elbow had plain radiography, MRI and CT arthrography, followed by routine arthroscopy of the elbow. The location and number of loose bodies determined by MRI and CT arthrography were recorded. Pre-operative plain radiography, MRI and CT arthrography were compared with arthroscopy. Both MRI and CT arthrography had excellent sensitivity (92% to 100%) but low to moderate specificity (15% to 77%) in identifying posteriorly-based loose bodies. Neither MRI nor CT arthrography was consistently sensitive (46% to 91%) or specific (13% to 73%) in predicting the presence or absence of loose bodies anteriorly. The overall sensitivity for the detection of loose bodies in either compartment was 88% to 100% and the specificity 20% to 70%. Pre-operative radiography had a similar sensitivity and specificity of 84% and 71%, respectively. Our results suggest that neither CT arthrography nor MRI is reliable or accurate enough to be any more effective than plain radiography alone in patients presenting with mechanical symptoms in the elbow.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15855372     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.87B5.14851

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  6 in total

1.  Arthroscopic loose-body removal in posterior compartment of the knee joint: a technical note.

Authors:  Jin Hwan Ahn; Jae Chul Yoo; Sang Hak Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2006-09-14       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Position paper on magnetic resonance imaging protocols in the musculoskeletal system (excluding the spine) by the Italian College of Musculoskeletal Radiology.

Authors:  Alberto Bellelli; Enzo Silvestri; Antonio Barile; Domenico Albano; Alberto Aliprandi; Roberto Caudana; Vito Chianca; Francesco Di Pietto; Carlo Faletti; Eugenio Genovese; Andrea Giovagnoni; Carlo Masciocchi; Carmelo Messina; Luca Maria Sconfienza; Vincenzo Spina; Marcello Zappia
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 3.469

3.  VIBE MRI: an alternative to CT in the imaging of sports-related osseous pathology?

Authors:  Eamon Koh; Edward Rj Walton; Phil Watson
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  The posterior transtriceps approach for elbow arthrography: a forgotten technique?

Authors:  M Lohman; C Borrero; B Casagranda; B Rafiee; J Towers
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Validity of musculoskeletal ultrasound for identification of humeroradial joint chondral lesions: a preliminary investigation.

Authors:  Chelsea M Lohman; Michael P Smith; Gregory S Dedrick; Jean-Michel Brismée
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2013-12-30       Impact factor: 2.860

6.  Loose Body in Elbow of a Baseball Player: Arthroscopic/Radiologic Correlation.

Authors:  Les Roger Folio; Steve H Craig; Gregory A Wright; Michael J Battaglia
Journal:  Radiol Case Rep       Date:  2015-11-06
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.