Literature DB >> 15855132

Percutaneous cholecystostomy catheter removal and incidence of clinically significant bile leaks: a clinical approach to catheter management.

James N Wise1, Debra A Gervais, Andrew Akman, Mukesh Harisinghani, Peter F Hahn, Peter R Mueller.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the incidence of bile leaks upon removal of small-bore percutaneous cholecystostomy catheters and to evaluate clinical and imaging guidelines to ensure safe catheter removal.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective evaluation of all gallbladder drainages performed over a 5-year period revealed 163 patients (range, 7-98 years) who underwent percutaneous cholecystostomy catheter placement. Medical records and imaging studies were reviewed to assess the events at catheter removal (e.g., inadvertent removal, controlled removal with cholangiography without tract imaging, or controlled removal with cholangiography with tract imaging) and the incidence of major and minor bile leaks.
RESULTS: The events at catheter removal were assessed in 66 patients. Group 1 was 45 patients whose catheters were removed after a minimum of approximately 3 weeks with a cholangiogram that established cystic and common duct patency and no imaging of the tract. Catheters were not removed until the patient recovered from acute illnesses that contributed to acalculous cholecystitis. Group 2 was 11 patients managed similarly to group 1 except that tract imaging was performed at catheter removal. Group 3 was 10 patients whose tubes came out inadvertently without cholangiogram or tract imaging. Two major (group 2 and group 3) and two minor (group 2) bile leaks occurred. No bile leaks occurred in group 1 (p = 0.006).
CONCLUSION: Major bile leaks occurred in 3% of patients, and minor leaks occurred with equal frequency. Tract imaging may not be necessary in patients with small-bore gallbladder catheters who have recovered from critical illness, show patent cystic and common ducts, and have had catheters for 3-6 weeks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15855132     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.184.5.01841647

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  6 in total

1.  Percutaneous imaging-guided interventions for acute biliary disorders in high surgical risk patients.

Authors:  Ragab Hani Donkol; Nahed Abdel Latif; Khaled Moghazy
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2010-09-28

2.  Role of percutaneous cholecystostomy for acute acalculous cholecystitis: clinical outcomes of 271 patients.

Authors:  Seung Yeon Noh; Dong Il Gwon; Gi-Young Ko; Hyun-Ki Yoon; Kyu-Bo Sung
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Image-guided percutaneous cholecystostomy: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Shayeri Roy Choudhury; Pankaj Gupta; Shikha Garg; Naveen Kalra; Mandeep Kang; Manavjit Singh Sandhu
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2021-05-22       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 4.  Percutaneous cholecystostomy: An update for the 2020s.

Authors:  Hakki Muammer Karakas; Gulsah Yildirim; Mehmet Mahir Fersahoglu; Ozge Findik
Journal:  North Clin Istanb       Date:  2021-10-06

5.  Long-Term Outcomes of Patients with Acute Cholecystitis after Successful Percutaneous Cholecystostomy Treatment and the Risk Factors for Recurrence: A Decade Experience at a Single Center.

Authors:  Chih-Hung Wang; Cheng-Yi Wu; Justin Cheng-Ta Yang; Wan-Ching Lien; Hsiu-Po Wang; Kao-Lang Liu; Yao-Ming Wu; Shyr-Chyr Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Safety and Efficacy of Early Tube Removal Following Percutaneous Transhepatic Gallbladder Drainage: an Observational Study.

Authors:  Hidehiro Kamezaki; Toshio Tsuyuguchi; Kenji Shimura; Dai Sakamoto; Junichi Senoo; Hideaki Mizumoto; Michio Kubota; Yu Yoshida; Ryosaku Azemoto; Harutoshi Sugiyama; Naoya Kato
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 1.455

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.