Literature DB >> 15855045

Corticofugal modulation of directional sensitivity in the midbrain of the big brown bat, Eptesicus fuscus.

Xiaoming Zhou1, Philip H-S Jen.   

Abstract

In our recent study of corticofugal modulation of collicular amplitude sensitivity of the big brown bat, Eptesicus fuscus, we suggested that the corticofugal modulation is based upon the best frequency (BF) differences and the relative amplitude sensitivity difference between collicular (IC) and cortical (AC) neurons but not the absolute amplitude sensitivity of IC and AC neurons. To show that corticofugal modulation is systematic and multiparametric, we studied corticofugal modulation of directional sensitivity in 89 corticofugally inhibited IC neurons in the same bat species under free field stimulation conditions. A neuron's directional sensitivity was expressed with the azimuthal range (AR) at 50% below the maximum of each directional sensitivity curve and the best azimuth (BAZ) at which the neuron discharged maximally. Cortical electrical stimulation did not affect the directional sensitivity of 40 (45%) neurons with BF(IC-AC) differences of 7.3+/-4.4kHz but sharpened the directional sensitivity of other 49 (55%) neurons with BF(IC-AC) differences of 2.3+/-1.8kHz. Corticofugal modulation sharpened directional sensitivity curves of IC neurons by decreasing the AR and shifting collicular BAZ toward cortical BAZ. The decrease in AR and the shift in BAZ increased significantly with AR(IC-AC) and BAZ(IC-AC) differences but not with absolute AR and BAZ of IC and AC neurons or BF(IC-AC) differences. Corticofual modulation also shifted collicular BF toward cortical BF. The shift in BF increased significantly with BF(IC-AC) differences but not with the BF of IC and AC neurons or BAZ shift. Consonant with our previous study, these data indicate that corticofugal modulation of collicular directional sensitivity is based on topographic projections between the IC and the AC and the difference in directional sensitivity but not the absolute directional sensitivity of IC or AC neurons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15855045     DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2004.12.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  13 in total

1.  Projections from auditory cortex contact ascending pathways that originate in the superior olive and inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Diana Coomes Peterson; Brett R Schofield
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-06-22       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 2.  Role of corticofugal feedback in hearing.

Authors:  Nobuo Suga
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2008-01-29       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 3.  Tuning shifts of the auditory system by corticocortical and corticofugal projections and conditioning.

Authors:  Nobuo Suga
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 8.989

4.  Optimizing optogenetic stimulation protocols in auditory corticofugal neurons based on closed-loop spike feedback.

Authors:  Charles-Henri Vila; Ross S Williamson; Kenneth E Hancock; Daniel B Polley
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 5.379

5.  Evidence for Layer-Specific Connectional Heterogeneity in the Mouse Auditory Corticocollicular System.

Authors:  Georgiy Yudintsev; Alexander R Asilador; Stacy Sons; Nathiya Vaithiyalingam Chandra Sekaran; Macey Coppinger; Kavya Nair; Masumi Prasad; Gang Xiao; Baher A Ibrahim; Yoshitaka Shinagawa; Daniel A Llano
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 6.709

Review 6.  Neural circuits underlying adaptation and learning in the perception of auditory space.

Authors:  Andrew J King; Johannes C Dahmen; Peter Keating; Nicholas D Leach; Fernando R Nodal; Victoria M Bajo
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 7.  Corticofugal modulation of peripheral auditory responses.

Authors:  Gonzalo Terreros; Paul H Delano
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2015-09-30

Review 8.  Development, organization and plasticity of auditory circuits: Lessons from a cherished colleague.

Authors:  Michael Lohse; Victoria M Bajo; Andrew J King
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 3.386

9.  Cortical modulation of auditory processing in the midbrain.

Authors:  Victoria M Bajo; Andrew J King
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 3.492

10.  The descending corticocollicular pathway mediates learning-induced auditory plasticity.

Authors:  Victoria M Bajo; Fernando R Nodal; David R Moore; Andrew J King
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2009-12-27       Impact factor: 24.884

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.