Literature DB >> 15855024

Preoperative differences of cerebral metabolism relate to the outcome of cochlear implants in congenitally deaf children.

Hyo Jeong Lee1, Eunjoo Kang, Seung-Ha Oh, Hyejin Kang, Dong Soo Lee, Myung Chul Lee, Chong-Sun Kim.   

Abstract

In congenitally deaf children, chronological age is generally accepted as a critical factor that affects successful rehabilitation following cochlear implantation (CI). However, a wide variance among patients is known to exist regardless of the age at CI [Sarant, J.Z., Blamey, P.J., Dowell, R.C., Clark, G.M., Gibson, W.P., 2001. Variation in speech perception scores among children with cochlear implants. Ear Hear. 22, 18-28]. In a previous study, we reported that prelingually deaf children in the age range 5-7 years at implantation showed greatest outcome variability [Oh S.H., Kim C.S., Kang E.J., Lee D.S., Lee H.J., Chang S.O., Ahn S.H., Hwang C.H., Park H.J., Koo J.W., 2003. Speech perception after cochlear implantation over a 4-year time period. Acta Otolaryngol. 123, 148-153]. Eleven children who underwent CI between the age of 5 and 7 1/2 years were subdivided into a good (above 65%: GOOD) and a poor (below 45%: POOR) group based on the performance in a speech perception test given 2 years after CI. The preoperative (18)F-FDG-PET (F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography) images were compared between the two groups in order to examine if regional glucose metabolic difference preexisted before the CI surgery. In the GOOD group, metabolic activity was greater in diverse fronto-parietal regions compared to the POOR group. In the POOR group, the regions related to the ventral visual pathway showed greater metabolic activity relative to the GOOD group. These findings suggest that the deaf children who had developed greater executive and visuospatial functions subserved by the prefrontal and parietal cortices might be successful in auditory language learning after CI. On the contrary, greater dependency on the visual function subserved by the occipito-temporal region due to auditory deprivation may interfere with acquisition of auditory language after CI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15855024     DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2004.11.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  22 in total

1.  Visual-motor integration skills of prelingually deaf children: implications for pediatric cochlear implantation.

Authors:  David L Horn; Mary K Fagan; Caitlin M Dillon; David B Pisoni; Richard T Miyamoto
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.325

2.  P1 cortical auditory evoked potential in children with unilateral or bilateral cochlear implants; implication for the timing of second cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Sung Wook Jeong; Seung Hyun Chung; Lee-Suk Kim
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  The role of language ability and self-regulation in the development of inattentive-hyperactive behavior problems.

Authors:  Isaac T Petersen; John E Bates; Angela D Staples
Journal:  Dev Psychopathol       Date:  2014-07-15

4.  Auditory cortical activation and plasticity after cochlear implantation measured by PET using fluorodeoxyglucose.

Authors:  Zuzanna Łukaszewicz-Moszyńska; Magdalena Lachowska; Kazimierz Niemczyk
Journal:  Funct Neurol       Date:  2014 Apr-Jun

Review 5.  Developmental neuroplasticity after cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Andrej Kral; Anu Sharma
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-19       Impact factor: 13.837

Review 6.  Developmental and cross-modal plasticity in deafness: evidence from the P1 and N1 event related potentials in cochlear implanted children.

Authors:  Anu Sharma; Julia Campbell; Garrett Cardon
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 2.997

7.  The value of Gesell score in predicting the outcome of cochlear implantation in children.

Authors:  Yang Yang; Liu Haihong; Zheng Jun; Chen Min; Li Ying; Hao Jinsheng; Liu Wei; Zhang Jie; Ni Xin
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 8.  Development and plasticity of intra- and intersensory information processing.

Authors:  Daniel B Polley; Andrea R Hillock; Christopher Spankovich; Maria V Popescu; David W Royal; Mark T Wallace
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2008 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.664

9.  Incidence of specific absolute neurocognitive impairment in globally intact children with histories of early severe deprivation.

Authors:  Michael E Behen; Emily Helder; Robert Rothermel; Katherine Solomon; Harry T Chugani
Journal:  Child Neuropsychol       Date:  2008-08-04       Impact factor: 2.500

10.  The P1 biomarker for assessing cortical maturation in pediatric hearing loss: a review.

Authors:  Anu Sharma; Hannah Glick; Emily Deeves; Erin Duncan
Journal:  Otorinolaringologia       Date:  2015-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.