Literature DB >> 15854938

Robotic assisted multivessel minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass with port-access stabilization and cardiac positioning: paving the way for outpatient coronary surgery?

Valavanur A Subramanian1, Nilesh U Patel, Nirav C Patel, Didier F Loulmet.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Minimimal access multivessel coronary artery bypass grafting with same day hospital discharge remains the ultimate goal. We evaluated the feasibility for achieving multivessel coronary bypass through minimal access.
METHODS: From January to July 2003, 30 patients under went off-pump minimally invasive multivessel coronary bypass. Internal mammary arteries were harvested with robotic telemanipulation with three ports. A 2-inch to 3-inch incision with soft tissue retractor was used to perform coronary anastomosis. Robotic ports were used to introduce stabilization and cardiac positioning devices. Endoscopic harvesting of radial artery was done when necessary.
RESULTS: Twenty-three patients (77%) had anterior throracotomy approach and 7 (23%) had transabdominal approach. Average number of bypass grafts was 2.6 (range 2-4). There was no mortality in hospital or on 30-day follow-up. Twenty-nine patients (97%) were extubated on the operating table. Two patients required reoperation for bleeding and 1 of those patients needed conversion to sternotomy for additional bypass grafting. Within 24 hours of surgery 50% of patients (n = 15) were discharged, 10% (n = 3) were discharged in 24 to 36 hours, 17% (n = 5) were discharged in 36 to 48 hours, 17% (n = 5) were discharged in 48 to 72 hours, and 2 patients stayed more than 3 days in the hospital. Two patients needed readmission to hospital within 30 days; 1 for pleural effusion and 1 for wound infection.
CONCLUSIONS: Robotic harvesting of internal mammary arteries and port access stabilization and cardiac positioning allows multivessel coronary bypass to be performed through a small incision. Currently, the majority of the patients can be safely discharged within 36 hours of operation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15854938     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.10.067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  14 in total

1.  Opportunities for the cost reduction of medical care.

Authors:  Monte Malach; W J Baumol
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2009-08

Review 2.  Current status of coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  Junjiro Kobayashi
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2008-06-18

3.  Robotic coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  Thierry A Folliguet; Alain Dibie; François Philippe; Fabrice Larrazet; Michel S Slama; François Laborde
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2010-10-09

Review 4.  A systematic review on robotic coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

Authors:  Christopher Cao; Praveen Indraratna; Mathew Doyle; David H Tian; Kevin Liou; Stine Munkholm-Larsen; Ciska Uys; Sohaib Virk
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2016-11

5.  Hybrid myocardial revascularization.

Authors:  Yugal Kishore Mishra; Jatin Yadav
Journal:  Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2018-03-05

6.  Long-term results of robotic-assisted coronary artery bypass grafting with composite arterial grafts for multiple coronary anastomoses: 10-year experience.

Authors:  Chung-Yu Lo; Chu-Leng Yu; Yen Chang; Hao-Ji Wei
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2022-03-22

7.  Early and mid-term results of minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  Shantanu Pande; Surendra K Agarwal; Devendra Gupta; Satayapriya Mohanty; Aditya Kapoor; Satyendra Tewari; Anubhav Bansal; Sushil P Ambesh
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2014-02-28

8.  Robotically-assisted coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  Thierry A Folliguet; Alain Dibie; François Philippe; Fabrice Larrazet; Michel S Slama; François Laborde
Journal:  Cardiol Res Pract       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 1.866

9.  Comparison of economic and patient outcomes with minimally invasive versus traditional off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting techniques.

Authors:  Robert S Poston; Richard Tran; Michael Collins; Marty Reynolds; Ingrid Connerney; Barry Reicher; David Zimrin; Bartley P Griffith; Stephen T Bartlett
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 10.  Establishing the case for minimally invasive, robotic-assisted CABG in the treatment of multivessel coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Brandon Jones; Pranjal Desai; Robert Poston
Journal:  Heart Surg Forum       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 0.676

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.