Literature DB >> 15854235

Analysis of cost related to clinical and angiographic outcomes of aneurysm patients enrolled in the international subarachnoid aneurysm trial in a North American setting.

Mohsen Javadpour1, Harsh Jain, M Christopher Wallace, Robert A Willinsky, Karel G ter Brugge, Michael Tymianski.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to compare, in a North American setting, the cost-effectiveness of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms. A secondary goal was to assess the clinical outcomes of patients enrolled into the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) from the largest contributing North American center.
METHODS: Of 230 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms, 62 were randomized into ISAT at our institution. Of these, 30 were randomized to endovascular coiling and 32 to neurosurgical clipping. For these, we evaluated the costs of treatment related to all aspects of the inpatient stay, the clinical outcomes at 2 months and at 1 year using the modified Rankin Scale, and the radiological outcomes at 6 months after Guglielmi detachable coiling.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the total cost of treatment between the endovascular group and the neurosurgical clipping group. The benefits of apparent decrease in length of stay in the endovascular group were offset by higher procedure costs. There were no significant differences in clinical outcomes at 2 months and at 1 year. At 6 months after coiling, 15 (50%) of 30 aneurysms were completely obliterated, and 19 (63%) of 30 were angiographically stable.
CONCLUSION: The high procedure costs of endovascular coiling tended to offset apparent reductions in length of stay. Long-term follow-up is indicated both for costs incurred after initial treatment and for clinical outcome in patients with incompletely obliterated aneurysms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15854235

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  5 in total

1.  A predictive model of hospitalization cost after cerebral aneurysm clipping.

Authors:  Kimon Bekelis; Symeon Missios; Todd A MacKenzie; Nicos Labropoulos; David W Roberts
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 5.836

2.  A Nationwide Analysis of Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Mortality, Complications, and Health Economics in the USA.

Authors:  Lefko T Charalambous; Syed M Adil; Shashank Rajkumar; Robert Gramer; Elayna Kirsch; Beiyu Liu; Ali Zomorodi; Mark McClellan; Shivanand P Lad
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 6.800

3.  Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Endovascular Coiling versus Neurosurgical Clipping for Intracranial Aneurysms in Republic of Korea.

Authors:  Hyuk Won Chang; Shang Hun Shin; Sang Hyun Suh; Bum-Soo Kim; Myung Ho Rho
Journal:  Neurointervention       Date:  2016-09-03

4.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of endovascular versus neurosurgical treatment for ruptured intracranial aneurysms in the United States.

Authors:  Alberto Maud; Kamakshi Lakshminarayan; M Fareed K Suri; Gabriela Vazquez; Giuseppe Lanzino; Adnan I Qureshi
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.115

5.  Cost of Treatment of Cerebral Aneurysm Embolization: Study of Associated Factors.

Authors:  Amine Cheikh; Razine Rachid; Aasfara Jehanne; Ababou Adil; Benomar Ali; Yahya Cherrah; El Hassani Amine; El Quessar Abdeljalil
Journal:  Neurol Ther       Date:  2016-06-09
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.