Literature DB >> 15853799

Identification of small scale biochemical networks based on general type system perturbations.

Henning Schmidt1, Kwang-Hyun Cho, Elling W Jacobsen.   

Abstract

New technologies enable acquisition of large data-sets containing genomic, proteomic and metabolic information that describe the state of a cell. These data-sets call for systematic methods enabling relevant information about the inner workings of the cell to be extracted. One important issue at hand is the understanding of the functional interactions between genes, proteins and metabolites. We here present a method for identifying the dynamic interactions between biochemical components within the cell, in the vicinity of a steady-state. Key features of the proposed method are that it can deal with data obtained under perturbations of any system parameter, not only concentrations of specific components, and that the direct effect of the perturbations does not need to be known. This is important as concentration perturbations are often difficult to perform in biochemical systems and the specific effects of general type perturbations are usually highly uncertain, or unknown. The basis of the method is a linear least-squares estimation, using time-series measurements of concentrations and expression profiles, in which system states and parameter perturbations are estimated simultaneously. An important side-effect of also employing estimation of the parameter perturbations is that knowledge of the system's steady-state concentrations, or activities, is not required and that deviations from steady-state prior to the perturbation can be dealt with. Time derivatives are computed using a zero-order hold discretization, shown to yield significant improvements over the widely used Euler approximation. We also show how network interactions with dynamics that are too fast to be captured within the available sampling time can be determined and excluded from the network identification. Known and unknown moiety conservation relationships can be processed in the same manner. The method requires that the number of samples equals at least the number of network components and, hence, is at present restricted to relatively small-scale networks. We demonstrate herein the performance of the method on two small-scale in silico genetic networks.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15853799     DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2005.04605.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  FEBS J        ISSN: 1742-464X            Impact factor:   5.542


  14 in total

1.  Optimization-based inference for temporally evolving networks with applications in biology.

Authors:  Young Hwan Chang; Joe Gray; Claire Tomlin
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.479

2.  Feedback analysis identifies a combination target for overcoming adaptive resistance to targeted cancer therapy.

Authors:  Sang-Min Park; Chae Young Hwang; Jihye Choi; Chang Young Joung; Kwang-Hyun Cho
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 9.867

3.  Quantifying biochemical reaction rates from static population variability within incompletely observed complex networks.

Authors:  Timon Wittenstein; Nava Leibovich; Andreas Hilfinger
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 4.779

4.  Network inference via adaptive optimal design.

Authors:  Johannes D Stigter; Jaap Molenaar
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2012-09-24

5.  Least-squares methods for identifying biochemical regulatory networks from noisy measurements.

Authors:  Jongrae Kim; Declan G Bates; Ian Postlethwaite; Pat Heslop-Harrison; Kwang-Hyun Cho
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-01-10       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  A simplified method for power-law modelling of metabolic pathways from time-course data and steady-state flux profiles.

Authors:  Tomoya Kitayama; Ayako Kinoshita; Masahiro Sugimoto; Yoichi Nakayama; Masaru Tomita
Journal:  Theor Biol Med Model       Date:  2006-07-17       Impact factor: 2.432

7.  Inferring cell-scale signalling networks via compressive sensing.

Authors:  Lei Nie; Xian Yang; Ian Adcock; Zhiwei Xu; Yike Guo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Reconstructing nonlinear dynamic models of gene regulation using stochastic sampling.

Authors:  Johanna Mazur; Daniel Ritter; Gerhard Reinelt; Lars Kaderali
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-12-28       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Experimental design for efficient identification of gene regulatory networks using sparse Bayesian models.

Authors:  Florian Steinke; Matthias Seeger; Koji Tsuda
Journal:  BMC Syst Biol       Date:  2007-11-16

10.  Inferring the gene network underlying the branching of tomato inflorescence.

Authors:  Laura Astola; Hans Stigter; Aalt D J van Dijk; Raymond van Daelen; Jaap Molenaar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.