Literature DB >> 15852421

Injectable bulking agents for treating faecal incontinence.

C J Vaizey1, M A Kamm.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Reports of the use of injectable bulking agents for faecal incontinence are currently confined to a small number of pilot studies. However, the use of these agents is rapidly becoming widespread based on this limited knowledge.
METHODS: This review provides an overview of the products available and the methods of delivery based on the pilot studies, selected articles reporting experience of these agents in urology, plastic surgery and laryngology, and some animal studies. RESULTS AND
CONCLUSIONS: Although bulking agents have been used to treat urinary incontinence for over four decades, their use in faecal incontinence has so far been limited. The large choice of products now available and the lack of a defined injection strategy will hamper efforts to produce meaningful prospective randomized trials. Copyright (c) 2005 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15852421     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.4997

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  17 in total

Review 1.  Investigation and treatment of faecal incontinence.

Authors:  S Maslekar; A Gardiner; C Maklin; G S Duthie
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 2.  Treatment strategies in obstructed defecation and fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Marat Khaikin; Steven-D Wexner
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-05-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Defecation disorders: neuromuscular aspects and treatment.

Authors:  Jose M Remes-Troche; Satish S C Rao
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2006-08

4.  Functional outcome after anal sphincter injury and treatment with mesenchymal stem cells.

Authors:  Levilester Salcedo; Marc Penn; Margot Damaser; Brian Balog; Massarat Zutshi
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 6.940

5.  Ultrasonographic evidence of Gatekeeper™ prosthesis migration in patients treated for faecal incontinence: a case series.

Authors:  F de la Portilla; M L Reyes-Díaz; M V Maestre; R M Jiménez-Rodríguez; A M García-Cabrera; J M Vázquez-Monchul; J M Díaz-Pavón; F C Padillo-Ruiz
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Efficacy and quality of life 2 years after treatment for faecal incontinence with injectable bulking agents.

Authors:  J Danielson; U Karlbom; T Wester; W Graf
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 3.781

7.  Comparison of bulking agents in the treatment of fecal incontinence: a prospective randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  O J Morris; S Smith; B Draganic
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2013-03-23       Impact factor: 3.781

8.  Injectable synthetic calcium hydroxylapatite ceramic microspheres (Coaptite) for passive fecal incontinence.

Authors:  E Ganio; F Marino; I Giani; A Realis Luc; G Clerico; E Novelli; M Trompetto
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2008-06-10       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 9.  Surgical Treatment Alternatives to Sacral Neuromodulation for Fecal Incontinence: Injectables, Sphincter Repair, and Colostomy.

Authors:  Srinivas Joga Ivatury; Lauren R Wilson; Ian M Paquette
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2021-01-28

10.  A prospective non-randomized two-centre study of patients with passive faecal incontinence after birth trauma and patients with soiling after anal surgery, treated by elastomer implants versus rectal irrigation.

Authors:  S J van der Hagen; W van der Meer; P B Soeters; C G Baeten; W G van Gemert
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.