Literature DB >> 15852358

Dedifferentiated parosteal osteosarcoma: the experience of the Rizzoli Institute.

Franco Bertoni1, Patrizia Bacchini, Eric L Staals, Peter Davidovitz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dedifferentiated parosteal osteosarcoma (DPOS) is a variant of osteosarcoma in which a high-grade sarcoma coexists with a conventional parosteal osteosarcoma (c-POS), either at presentation (synchronous type) or at the time of recurrence (metachronous type). Only approximately 60 patients have been reported in the literature. The objective of this study was to analyze the clinicopathologic and radiographic features of a relatively large number of patients with DPOS in an attempt to define further the histologic and biologic behavior of this rare entity.
METHODS: In a series of 120 patients with parosteal osteosarcoma who were seen at the Rizzoli Institute from 1958 to 2000, the authors identified 29 patients who were diagnosed with DPOS. The authors reviewed the clinical and radiologic features, histologic sections, treatments, and outcomes in this group of patients with DPOS.
RESULTS: Twelve patients were male, and 17 patients were female. The patients ranged in age from 15 years to 65 yrs (average, 36 years; median, 32 years). One tumor involved the scapula, one involved the ilium, and another involved the skull. All 26 of the other tumors were located in the long bones (14 in the femur, 5 in the humerus, 3 in the tibia, 3 in the fibula, and 1 in the ulna). In 18 patients, radiographic areas of lucency were seen within an otherwise sclerotic lesion. Histologically, the dedifferentiated component was high-grade osteoblastic osteosarcoma in 14 patients, fibroblastic osteosarcoma in 10 patients, giant cell-rich osteosarcoma in 3 patients, and chondroblastic osteosarcoma in 2 patients. All tumors were Stage IIB, and invasion of the medullary canal was detected in 19 patients (65%). Twenty-eight patients underwent surgery, and 18 of those patients received chemotherapy (5 patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and 13 patients received adjuvant). Nine patients were dead and 20 patients were alive (average follow-up, 107 months; range, from 3 months to 36 years) at the last follow-up. Of the nine patients who died, one patient received no treatment, five patients underwent surgery (with three patients achieving adequate margins) in combination with chemotherapy, and three patients underwent surgery only (with adequate margins achieved). Of the 20 patients who remained alive, 13 patients underwent surgery (with 10 patients achieving adequate margins) in combination with chemotherapy, whereas 7 patients underwent surgery only (all with adequate margins). Seven of the nine patients who died had widespread metastases. One patient died of causes unrelated to the tumor, and another patient died shortly after undergoing resection of a lesion in the skull.
CONCLUSIONS: Dedifferentiation occurred in approximately 24% of patients with c-POS. The prognosis for patients with DPOS was better than the prognosis for patients with dedifferentiated central and dedifferentiated peripheral chondrosarcoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15852358     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.21039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  17 in total

Review 1.  A review of imaging of surface sarcomas of bone.

Authors:  Kelly Harper; Paul Sathiadoss; Asif Saifuddin; Adnan Sheikh
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Dedifferentiated parosteal osteosarcoma of the calvaria.

Authors:  Rajiv Mangla; Manisha Mangla; Shuo Li; Ahmed Abdelbaki; Itisha Bansal; Anil Kumar; Yogesh Kumar
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2018-01-03

3.  Osteoma of long bone: an expanding spectrum of imaging findings.

Authors:  Barry Glenn Hansford; Peter Pytel; Drew D Moore; Gregory Scott Stacy
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2014-11-09       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Parosteal osteosarcoma dedifferentiating into telangiectatic osteosarcoma: importance of lytic changes and fluid cavities at imaging.

Authors:  M Azura; D Vanel; M Alberghini; P Picci; E Staals; M Mercuri
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2009-03-07       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  A comparison of intramedullary and juxtacortical low-grade osteogenic sarcoma.

Authors:  Joseph H Schwab; Cristina R Antonescu; Edward A Athanasian; Patrick J Boland; John H Healey; Carol D Morris
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-04-19       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  GNAS mutations are not detected in parosteal and low-grade central osteosarcomas.

Authors:  Carolina Salinas-Souza; Carlos De Andrea; Michel Bihl; Michal Kovac; Nischalan Pillay; Tim Forshew; Alice Gutteridge; Hongtao Ye; M Fernanda Amary; Roberto Tirabosco; Silvia Regina Caminada Toledo; Daniel Baumhoer; Adrienne M Flanagan
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 7.842

7.  Dedifferentiated parosteal osteosarcoma with giant cell tumor component.

Authors:  Diana M Cardona; Jacquelyn A Knapik; John D Reith
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2008-02-07       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Solitary bone lesions: which ones to worry about?

Authors:  Daniel Vanel; Eugenio Rimondi; Maia Vanel; Marco Gambarotti; Marco Alberghini
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 3.909

9.  Reconstruction of bone defect with autograft fibula and retained part of tibia after marginal resection of periosteal osteosarcoma: a case report.

Authors:  Tongyu Hu; Wei Chen; Jianheng Li; Chenguang Du; Yingze Zhang
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 2.754

10.  Surface osteosarcomas: Diagnosis, treatment and outcome.

Authors:  Venkatesan Sampath Kumar; Nilesh Barwar; Shah Alam Khan
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.251

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.