Literature DB >> 15851341

Improved defibrillation efficacy with an ascending ramp waveform in humans.

Stephen R Shorofsky1, Eric Rashba, William Havel, Paul Belk, Paul Degroot, Charles Swerdlow, Michael R Gold.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare an ascending ramp waveform (RAMP) with a standard, clinically available biphasic truncated exponential waveform (BTE) for defibrillation in humans.
BACKGROUND: In animal studies, RAMP had a lower defibrillation threshold (DFT) than BTE.
METHODS: We studied 63 patients at implantable cardioverter-defibrillator placement using a dual-coil lead and left pectoral active can. The subjects were divided into two groups, one with a 12-ms ascending first phase and one with a 7-ms ascending first phase. Phase 2 of RAMP for both groups was a truncated exponential decay with 65% tilt and reversed polarity. The BTE had a 50% tilt in each phase. DFT and upper limit of vulnerability (ULV) were measured for both waveforms using a binary search protocol.
RESULTS: The patient population was 77% male, with a mean age of 63 +/- 10 years and ejection fraction of 33 +/- 13%. Delivered energy at DFT was lower with the 7-ms RAMP vs BTE (5.4 +/- 2.6 J vs 6.5 +/- 3.4 J; P < .01) but unchanged with the 12-ms RAMP (7.4 +/- 4.5 J vs 7.1 +/- 4.9 J). Maximal voltage at DFT was significantly lower with either RAMP compared to BTE (P < .01). There was a strong correlation between ULV and DFT for both RAMP and BTE (P < .01).
CONCLUSIONS: The 7-ms ascending ramp waveform significantly reduced delivered energy (18%) and voltage (24%) at DFT, whereas the 12-ms RAMP reduced only DFT voltage. This is the first report of a waveform that is superior to a BTE for defibrillation in humans. ULV correlates with DFT for RAMP, supporting the use of ULV testing for implantation of devices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15851341     DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2004.12.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Rhythm        ISSN: 1547-5271            Impact factor:   6.343


  4 in total

1.  Ascending-ramp biphasic waveform has a lower defibrillation threshold and releases less troponin I than a truncated exponential biphasic waveform.

Authors:  Jian Huang; Gregory P Walcott; Richard B Ruse; Scott J Bohanan; Cheryl R Killingsworth; Raymond E Ideker
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 2.  Optimizing defibrillation waveforms for ICDs.

Authors:  Mark W Kroll; Charles D Swerdlow
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2007-06-01       Impact factor: 1.900

3.  Extended charge banking model of dual path shocks for implantable cardioverter defibrillators.

Authors:  Derek J Dosdall; James D Sweeney
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 2.819

4.  First-time evaluation of ascending compared to rectangular transthoracic defibrillation waveforms in modelled out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Tobias Neumann; Simon-Richard Finke; Maja Henninger; Sebastian Lemke; Ben Hoepfner; Daniel Steven; Alexandra C Maul; Daniel C Schroeder; Thorsten Annecke
Journal:  Resusc Plus       Date:  2020-06-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.