Literature DB >> 15851339

Comparison of stimulation sites within left ventricular veins on the acute hemodynamic effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Michael R Gold1, Angelo Auricchio, John D Hummel, Michael C Giudici, Jiang Ding, Bruce Tockman, Julio Spinelli.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to study the acute hemodynamic effect of left ventricular (LV) stimulation sites within a coronary vein.
BACKGROUND: Access to LV stimulation sites for resynchronization therapy is achieved using specialized lead systems navigated through a coronary vein. The effects of stimulation in different coronary veins have been evaluated previously, but less is known about stimulation sites within a coronary vein.
METHODS: Twenty-four patients (New York Heart Association functional class II-IV, age 59 +/- 10 years, ejection fraction 21 +/- 7%, QRS 166 +/- 30 ms) were enrolled in the study. A novel over-the-wire lead system was used to access an anterior or lateral coronary vein. At each lead location, a randomized stimulation protocol was executed. Hemodynamic responses were evaluated using LV dP/dtmax.
RESULTS: The mean time to cannulate the coronary sinus and position the LV lead was 19 +/- 30 minutes and 17 +/- 18 minutes, respectively. Data from stimulation at two sites within a coronary vein were obtained in 19 patients (anterior vein 11; lateral vein 8). Of these patients, 14 (anterior vein 9; lateral vein 5) showed large improvement in dP/dtmax (22%-25% in anterior vein, 37%-40% in lateral vein). Overall, there were no group differences in hemodynamic effects among different stimulation sites within a coronary vein, although significant variability among sites was observed in individuals.
CONCLUSIONS: Resynchronization therapy through a coronary vein improves acute hemodynamic function of heart failure patients with LV conduction disorder. There were no significant differences between basal and apical pacing sites for this group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15851339     DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2004.12.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Rhythm        ISSN: 1547-5271            Impact factor:   6.343


  14 in total

Review 1.  How to improve outcomes with cardiac resynchronisation therapy: importance of lead positioning.

Authors:  Peter J Cowburn; Christophe Leclercq
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.214

Review 2.  Targeting left ventricular lead placement to improve cardiac resynchronization therapy outcomes.

Authors:  Jeffrey Liu; Evan Adelstein; Samir Saba
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 3.  Cardiac resynchronization therapy: Dire need for targeted left ventricular lead placement and optimal device programming.

Authors:  Sokratis Pastromas; Antonis S Manolis
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2014-12-26

4.  Cardiac resynchronization therapy update: evolving indications, expanding benefit?

Authors:  C Butcher; Y Mareev; V Markides; M Mason; T Wong; J G F Cleland
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.931

5.  Quantitative Analysis of Electro-Anatomical Maps: Application to an Experimental Model of Left Bundle Branch Block/Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.

Authors:  David Soto Iglesias; Nicolas Duchateau; Constantine Butakoff Kostantyn Butakov; David Andreu; Juan Fernandez-Armenta; Bart Bijnens; Antonio Berruezo; Marta Sitges; Oscar Camara
Journal:  IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 3.316

6.  Chest radiography is a poor predictor of left ventricular lead position in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy: comparison with multidetector computed tomography.

Authors:  John Rickard; Christopher Ingelmo; Dan Sraow; Bruce L Wilkoff; Richard A Grimm; Paul Schoenhagen; Patrick J Tchou; Milind Y Desai
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 1.900

7.  Changes in the optimal cardiac resynchronization therapy pacing configuration during physiologic stress.

Authors:  Brett D Atwater; W Schuyler Jones; Zak Loring; Daniel J Friedman
Journal:  J Electrocardiol       Date:  2020-08-19       Impact factor: 1.438

8.  Right ventricular lead adjustment in cardiac resynchronization therapy and acute hemodynamic response: a pilot study.

Authors:  Prabhat Kumar; Gaurav A Upadhyay; Christine Cavaliere-Ogus; E Kevin Heist; Robert K Altman; Neal A Chatterjee; Kimberly A Parks; Jagmeet P Singh
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 9.  Strategies to improve cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Kevin Vernooy; Caroline J M van Deursen; Marc Strik; Frits W Prinzen
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 32.419

10.  Determinants of LV dP/dtmax and QRS duration with different fusion strategies in cardiac resynchronisation therapy.

Authors:  Hans Henrik Odland; Torbjørn Holm; Lars Ove Gammelsrud; Richard Cornelussen; Erik Kongsgaard
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2021-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.