Literature DB >> 15851288

Response of beat-by-beat QT variability to sympathetic stimulation in the LQT1 form of congenital long QT syndrome.

Kazuhiro Satomi1, Wataru Shimizu, Hiroshi Takaki, Kazuhiro Suyama, Takashi Kurita, Naohiko Aihara, Shiro Kamakura.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that the lability of beat-by-beat QT variability is prominent during sympathetic stimulation in LQT1 patients. We analyzed beat-by-beat QT variability using a newly developed program and applied cross-correlation methods in LQT1 patients before and after epinephrine infusion.
BACKGROUND: Studies suggest that cardiac events associated with sympathetic stimulation are more common in the LQT1 form than the LQT2 and LQT3 forms of congenital long QT syndrome (LQTS). Although beat-by-beat alternation of T-wave morphology is observed in LQTS, its objective estimation is difficult because of complicated T-wave morphology.
METHODS: Twelve-lead ECG was recorded under baseline conditions and during epinephrine infusion (0.1 mug/kg/min) in 14 LQT1 and five control patients. We measured beat-by-beat QT interval by a cross-correlation technique. Mean of successive changes in RR (DeltaRR), QT (DeltaQT), standard deviation of DeltaRR (SD-DeltaRR), DeltaQT (SD-DeltaQT), and QTI (QT/ RR) before and after epinephrine were compared between the two groups.
RESULTS: No significant differences in any parameters were observed between the two groups under baseline conditions. DeltaQT, SD-DeltaQT, and QTI were increased in LQT1 but not in control patients during epinephrine (LQT1: DeltaQT 2.3-4.2 ms, SD-DeltaQT 2.2-4.1, QTI 0.10-0.22, P < .005 vs baseline; CONTROL: DeltaQT 2.5-2.4 ms, SD-DeltaQT 1.9-2.1, QTI 0.08-0.09: P = NS vs baseline).
CONCLUSIONS: Beat-by-beat QT variability analyzed by the cross-correlation method was greater in LQT1 patients during epinephrine infusion, suggesting sympathetic stimulation accentuates beat-by-beat alternation of repolarization in LQT1 patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15851288     DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2004.11.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Rhythm        ISSN: 1547-5271            Impact factor:   6.343


  9 in total

1.  Sodium channel blockers enhance the temporal QT interval variability in the right precordial leads in Brugada syndrome.

Authors:  Tetsuzou Kanemori; Hiroki Shimizu; Katsumi Oka; Yoshio Furukawa; Kenji Hiromoto; Takanao Mine; Tohru Masuyama; Mitsumasa Ohyanagi
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.468

Review 2.  The impact of varying autonomic states on the dynamic beat-to-beat QT-RR and QT-TQ interval relationships.

Authors:  A A Fossa
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2008-04-21       Impact factor: 8.739

3.  Autonomic and Cardiac Repolarization Lability in Long QT Syndrome Patients.

Authors:  Natalia DeMaria; Ahmed Selmi; Samuel Kashtan; Xiaojuan Xia; Matthew Wang; Wojciech Zareba; Jean-Philippe Couderc; David S Auerbach
Journal:  Auton Neurosci       Date:  2020-09-06       Impact factor: 3.145

4.  Variability of action potential duration in pharmacologically induced long QT syndrome type 1.

Authors:  Caroline L Ring; Salim F Idriss; Wanda Krassowska Neu
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2009

5.  Use of ECG restitution (beat-to-beat QT-TQ interval analysis) to assess arrhythmogenic risk of QTc prolongation with guanfacine.

Authors:  Anthony A Fossa; Meijian Zhou; Antoine Robinson; Jaideep Purkayastha; Patrick Martin
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 1.468

6.  The high frequency relationship: implications for torsadogenic hERG blockers.

Authors:  P Champeroux; J Y Le Guennec; S Jude; C Laigot; A Maurin; M L Sola; J S L Fowler; S Richard; J Thireau
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 8.739

7.  QT interval variability in body surface ECG: measurement, physiological basis, and clinical value: position statement and consensus guidance endorsed by the European Heart Rhythm Association jointly with the ESC Working Group on Cardiac Cellular Electrophysiology.

Authors:  Mathias Baumert; Alberto Porta; Marc A Vos; Marek Malik; Jean-Philippe Couderc; Pablo Laguna; Gianfranco Piccirillo; Godfrey L Smith; Larisa G Tereshchenko; Paul G A Volders
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 5.214

8.  Mechanisms Underlying Interactions Between Low-Frequency Oscillations and Beat-to-Beat Variability of Celullar Ventricular Repolarization in Response to Sympathetic Stimulation: Implications for Arrhythmogenesis.

Authors:  David Adolfo Sampedro-Puente; Jesus Fernandez-Bes; Bradley Porter; Stefan van Duijvenboden; Peter Taggart; Esther Pueyo
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 4.566

9.  QT Adaptation and Intrinsic QT Variability in Congenital Long QT Syndrome.

Authors:  Srikanth Seethala; Prabhpreet Singh; Vladimir Shusterman; Margareth Ribe; Kristina H Haugaa; Jan Němec
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 5.501

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.