OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to analyze the velocities across the coronary sinus ostium (cross-CSo) and within the coronary sinus (intra-CS) in patients with and without paroxysmal atrial (AF) fibrillation and to estimate the interatrial conduction deterioration area in AF patients. BACKGROUND: Interatrial conduction delay in AF patients has been reported. However, localization of the interatrial conduction delay still is not clear. METHODS: Thirteen patients with paroxysmal AF and 10 control patients with AV nodal reentrant tachycardia or ectopic atrial tachycardia were enrolled in the study. Right atrial and CS mapping were performed using the CARTO electroanatomic mapping system during sinus rhythm and during distal CS pacing. The activation times and spatial distances of cross-CSo and intra-CS were measured between paired sites, from which the activation velocities of cross-CSo and intra-CS were obtained. RESULTS: During sinus rhythm, the activation velocities of cross-CSo in the AF group (1.2 +/- 0.2 m/s) were significantly slower than those in the control group (2.9 +/- 1.6 m/s, P < .05). During distal CS pacing, the cross-CSo velocities of the AF group (1.0 +/- 0.5 m/s) also appeared slower than those in the control group (1.4 +/- 0.2 m/s, P = .07). However, no difference was found in intra-CS activation velocities between the two groups (2.8 +/- 1.9 vs 3.2 +/- 2.2 m/s and 1.5 +/- 0.3 vs 1.4 +/- 0.3 m/s, P > .05 during sinus rhythm and distal CS pacing, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Interatrial conduction at the posteroparaseptal region across the CS ostium was significantly slower in patients with paroxysmal AF than in control patients, further supporting the link between interatrial conduction deterioration and paroxysmal AF.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to analyze the velocities across the coronary sinus ostium (cross-CSo) and within the coronary sinus (intra-CS) in patients with and without paroxysmal atrial (AF) fibrillation and to estimate the interatrial conduction deterioration area in AFpatients. BACKGROUND: Interatrial conduction delay in AFpatients has been reported. However, localization of the interatrial conduction delay still is not clear. METHODS: Thirteen patients with paroxysmal AF and 10 control patients with AV nodal reentrant tachycardia or ectopic atrial tachycardia were enrolled in the study. Right atrial and CS mapping were performed using the CARTO electroanatomic mapping system during sinus rhythm and during distal CS pacing. The activation times and spatial distances of cross-CSo and intra-CS were measured between paired sites, from which the activation velocities of cross-CSo and intra-CS were obtained. RESULTS: During sinus rhythm, the activation velocities of cross-CSo in the AF group (1.2 +/- 0.2 m/s) were significantly slower than those in the control group (2.9 +/- 1.6 m/s, P < .05). During distal CS pacing, the cross-CSo velocities of the AF group (1.0 +/- 0.5 m/s) also appeared slower than those in the control group (1.4 +/- 0.2 m/s, P = .07). However, no difference was found in intra-CS activation velocities between the two groups (2.8 +/- 1.9 vs 3.2 +/- 2.2 m/s and 1.5 +/- 0.3 vs 1.4 +/- 0.3 m/s, P > .05 during sinus rhythm and distal CS pacing, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Interatrial conduction at the posteroparaseptal region across the CS ostium was significantly slower in patients with paroxysmal AF than in control patients, further supporting the link between interatrial conduction deterioration and paroxysmal AF.
Authors: Gautam G Lalani; Amir Schricker; Michael Gibson; Armand Rostamian; David E Krummen; Sanjiv M Narayan Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2012-02-07 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Jared W Magnani; Mary Ann Williamson; Patrick T Ellinor; Kevin M Monahan; Emelia J Benjamin Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2009-02