Literature DB >> 15850036

Comparison of papanicolaou (Pap) test rates across Ontario and factors associated with cervical screening.

Gordon Fehringer1, Roberta Howlett, Michelle Cotterchio, Neil Klar, Vicky Majpruz-Moat, Verna Mai.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer remains a significant yet preventable disease despite the widespread availability of Pap test screening, which detects cervical cancer and its precursor lesions. The aims of this study were to: i) estimate and compare age- and hysterectomy-adjusted Pap test rates across the 37 Ontario public health units (PHUs), and ii) explore the association between several factors and Pap test rates (at the ecological level).
METHODS: Cytobase, an Ontario Pap test registry, captures more than 80% of all Pap tests in Ontario. Cytobase was used to determine Pap test rates adjusted for age, hysterectomy and Cytobase coverage for the year 2001. Multiple linear regression analyses were used to evaluate the relationship between Pap test rates and various factors at an ecological level,
RESULTS: Age-, hysterectomy- and Cytobase-adjusted one-year Pap rates ranged from 11.6% to 73.9% among PHUs. The overall rate for Ontario was 40.7%. Multivariate analyses indicated that the presence of a teaching hospital was associated with higher Pap test rates.
CONCLUSION: One-year Pap test rates varied greatly across the 37 public health units in Ontario. Pap test rates determined using Cytobase were lower than self-reported rates obtained from the Canadian Community Health Survey, possibly due to "over-reporting". In general, women were not screened as frequently as recommended by the Ontario Cervical Screening Program. A positive association was observed between Pap test rates and the presence of a teaching hospital. Data quality issues limit the ability to monitor cervical screening. A provincial registry would address these issues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15850036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Public Health        ISSN: 0008-4263


  7 in total

1.  Sociodemographic factors associated with cervical cancer screening and follow-up of abnormal results.

Authors:  Laurie Elit; Monika Krzyzanowska; Refik Saskin; Lisa Barbera; Asma Razzaq; Aisha Lofters; Naira Yeritsyan; Arlene Bierman
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Strategies for Increasing Cervical Cancer Screening Amongst First Nations Communities in Northwest Ontario, Canada.

Authors:  Marion Maar; Pamela Wakewich; Brianne Wood; Alberto Severini; Julian Little; Ann N Burchell; Gina Ogilvie; Ingeborg Zehbe
Journal:  Health Care Women Int       Date:  2014-11-24

3.  Determining use of preventive health care in Ontario: comparison of rates of 3 maneuvers in administrative and survey data.

Authors:  Li Wang; X Nie Jason; Ross E G Upshur
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  Cervical cancer screening by immigrant and minority women in Canada.

Authors:  James Ted McDonald; Steven Kennedy
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2007-10

5.  The validity of self-reported cancer screening history and the role of social disadvantage in Ontario, Canada.

Authors:  Aisha Lofters; Mandana Vahabi; Richard H Glazier
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  No evidence of excessive cancer screening in female noncarriers from BRCA1/2 mutation-positive families.

Authors:  S Guedaoura; S Pelletier; W D Foulkes; P Hamet; J Simard; N Wong; Z El Haffaf; J Chiquette; M Dorval
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 3.677

7.  Trends in laboratory testing for diabetes in Ontario, Canada 1995-2005: a population-based study.

Authors:  Sarah E Wilson; Lorraine L Lipscombe; Laura C Rosella; Douglas G Manuel
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 2.655

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.