Literature DB >> 15849755

Rapid assessment of contact-dependent secondary structure propensity: relevance to amyloidogenic sequences.

Sukjoon Yoon1, William J Welsh.   

Abstract

We have previously demonstrated that calculation of contact-dependent secondary structure propensity (CSSP) is highly sensitive in detecting non-native beta-strand propensities in the core sequences of known amyloidogenic proteins. Here we describe a CSSP method based on an artificial neural network that rapidly and accurately quantifies the influence of tertiary contacts (TCs) on secondary structure propensity in local regions of protein sequences. The present method exhibited 72% accuracy in predicting the alternate secondary structure adopted by chameleon sequences located in highly disparate TC regions. Analysis of 1930 nonhomologous protein domains reveals that the alpha-helix and the beta-strand largely share the same sequence context, and that tertiary context is a major determinant of the native conformation. Conversely, it appears that the propensity of random coils for either the alpha-helix or the beta-strand is largely invariant to tertiary effects. The present CSSP method successfully reproduced the amyloidogenic character observed in local regions of the human islet amyloid polypeptide (hIAPP). Furthermore, CSSP profiles were strongly correlated (r = 0.76) with the observed mutational effects on the aggregation rate of acylphosphatase. Taken together, these results provide compelling evidence in support of the present CSSP approach as a sensitive probe useful for analysis of full-length proteins and for detection of core sequences that may trigger amyloid fibril formation. The combined speed and simplicity of the CSSP method lends itself to proteome-wide analysis of the amyloidogenic nature of common proteins.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15849755     DOI: 10.1002/prot.20477

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  9 in total

1.  Analysis of chameleon sequences by energy decomposition on a pairwise per-residue basis.

Authors:  Sukjoon Yoon; Heeyoung Jung
Journal:  Protein J       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.371

2.  The 3D profile method for identifying fibril-forming segments of proteins.

Authors:  Michael J Thompson; Stuart A Sievers; John Karanicolas; Magdalena I Ivanova; David Baker; David Eisenberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-03-07       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Amyloidogenesis of natively unfolded proteins.

Authors:  Vladimir N Uversky
Journal:  Curr Alzheimer Res       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.498

4.  Unfolding, aggregation, and amyloid formation by the tetramerization domain from mutant p53 associated with lung cancer.

Authors:  Yuichiro Higashimoto; Yuya Asanomi; Satoru Takakusagi; Marc S Lewis; Kohei Uosaki; Stewart R Durell; Carl W Anderson; Ettore Appella; Kazuyasu Sakaguchi
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2006-02-14       Impact factor: 3.162

5.  Structure and aggregation mechanism of beta(2)-microglobulin (83-99) peptides studied by molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Chungwen Liang; Philippe Derreumaux; Guanghong Wei
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2007-08-10       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Predicting continuous local structure and the effect of its substitution for secondary structure in fragment-free protein structure prediction.

Authors:  Eshel Faraggi; Yuedong Yang; Shesheng Zhang; Yaoqi Zhou
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 5.006

7.  A theoretical study of polymorphism in VQIVYK fibrils.

Authors:  Jaehoon Yang; Mithila V Agnihotri; Carol J Huseby; Jeff Kuret; Sherwin J Singer
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  NetCSSP: web application for predicting chameleon sequences and amyloid fibril formation.

Authors:  Changsik Kim; Jiwon Choi; Seong Joon Lee; William J Welsh; Sukjoon Yoon
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-05-25       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Prediction of Peptide and Protein Propensity for Amyloid Formation.

Authors:  Carlos Família; Sarah R Dennison; Alexandre Quintas; David A Phoenix
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.