Literature DB >> 15849455

Proposed classification of segments of the internal carotid artery: anatomical study with angiographical interpretation.

Ibrahim M Ziyal1, Tunçalp Ozgen, Laligam N Sekhar, Osman E Ozcan, Saruhan Cekirge.   

Abstract

The nomenclature and borders of the segments of the internal carotid artery (ICA) remain confusing. A classification of segments of the ICA is proposed based on constant anatomical structures, such as the carotid foramen and canal, the petrous bone, the petrolingual ligament (PLL), and the proximal and distal dural rings. The bilateral ICAs were dissected in 15 cadaveric head specimens using different neurosurgical approaches. The bilateral lacerum foramina were studied in five dry skulls. The bilateral segments of the ICA were also examined on carotid angiograms of 10 normal patients and another with the ophthalmic artery originating from the intracavernous portion of the ICA. The present classification divides the ICA into five segments in the direction of the blood flow. The cervical segment is extradural and extracranial, the petrous segment is extradural and intraosseous, the cavernous segment is interdural and intracavernous, the clinoidal segment is interdural and paracavernous, and the cisternal segment is intradural and intracisternal. The ICA did not pass through the lacerum foramen in any specimen. In all specimens, 1/8 to 5/8 of the lacerum foramen was under the deep dural layer of the cavernous sinus. The term 'lacerum segment' as used previously and called the 'trigeminal segment' by us cannot be justified. The PLL is the posterolateral border of the cavernous sinus and the lacerum and trigeminal segments should be included in the cavernous and petrous segments. The ophthalmic artery may originate from the clinoidal ICA, from the cavernous ICA, or from the middle meningeal artery. Instead of using the term 'ophthalmic segment,' the term 'cisternal segment' should be used for the anatomically distinct ICA in the subarachnoid space. This classification should be minimally affected by anatomical variations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15849455     DOI: 10.2176/nmc.45.184

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)        ISSN: 0470-8105            Impact factor:   1.742


  13 in total

Review 1.  Comprehensive review on rhino-neurosurgery.

Authors:  Werner Hosemann; Henry W S Schroeder
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2015-12-22

2.  Anatomical relationships of intracavernous internal carotid artery to intracavernous neural structures.

Authors:  Pakrit Jittapiromsak; Hakan Sabuncuoglu; Pushpa Deshmukh; Cameron G McDougall; Robert F Spetzler; Mark C Preul
Journal:  Skull Base       Date:  2010-09

3.  Analysis of the tortuosity of the internal carotid artery in the cavernous sinus.

Authors:  Christoph J Griessenauer; Bulent Yalcin; Petru Matusz; Marios Loukas; Charles G Kulwin; R Shane Tubbs; Aaron A Cohen Gadol
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 1.475

4.  Finding the Petroclival Carotid Artery: The Vidian-Eustachian Junction as a Reliable Landmark.

Authors:  Gretchen M Oakley; Jareen Ebenezer; Aneeza Hamizan; Peta-Lee Sacks; Darren Rom; Raymond Sacks; Mark Winder; Andrew Davidson; Charles Teo; C Arturo Solares; Richard J Harvey
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2017-11-27

Review 5.  Danger points, complications and medico-legal aspects in endoscopic sinus surgery.

Authors:  W Hosemann; C Draf
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2013-12-13

6.  Paraclival or Cavernous Internal Carotid Artery: One Segment but Two Names.

Authors:  Puya Alikhani; Sananthan Sivakanthan; Harry van Loveren; Siviero Agazzi
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2015-11-30

7.  Proposed clinical internal carotid artery classification system.

Authors:  Saleem I Abdulrauf; Ahmed M Ashour; Eric Marvin; Jeroen Coppens; Brian Kang; Tze Yu Yeh Hsieh; Breno Nery; Juan R Penanes; Aysha K Alsahlawi; Shawn Moore; Hussam Abou Al-Shaar; Joanna Kemp; Kanika Chawla; Nanthiya Sujijantarat; Alaa Najeeb; Nadeem Parkar; Vilaas Shetty; Tina Vafaie; Jastin Antisdel; Tony A Mikulec; Randall Edgell; Jonathan Lebovitz; Matt Pierson; Paulo Henrique Pires de Aguiar; Paula Buchanan; Angela Di Cosola; George Stevens
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep

8.  Quantitative analysis of anatomical relationship between cavernous segment internal carotid artery and pituitary macroadenoma.

Authors:  Bon-Jour Lin; Tzu-Tsao Chung; Meng-Chi Lin; Chin Lin; Dueng-Yuan Hueng; Yuan-Hao Chen; Chung-Ching Hsia; Da-Tong Ju; Hsin-I Ma; Ming-Ying Liu; Chi-Tun Tang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.889

9.  A Comparison of Stent Implant versus Medical Treatment for Severe Symptomatic Intracranial Stenosis: A Controlled Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Rezao Mohammadian; Ali Pashapour; Ehsan Sharifipour; Reza Mansourizadeh; Farideh Mohammadian; Ali Akbar Taher Aghdam; Mohammad Mousavi; Farhad Dadras
Journal:  Cerebrovasc Dis Extra       Date:  2012-11-01

10.  Unilateral congenital elongation of the cervical part of the internal carotid artery with kinking and looping: two case reports and review of the literature.

Authors:  Nikolai A Ovchinnikov; Ramesh T Rao; Suresh R Rao
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2007-07-25       Impact factor: 2.151

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.