Literature DB >> 15848330

Health related quality of life after percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass graft surgery in patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation. 12-month follow up.

Bozena Szygula-Jurkiewicz1, Marian Zembala, Krzysztof Wilczek, Romuald Wojnicz, Lech Polonski.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The efficacy of percutaneous and surgical revascularization in acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation is similar. Therefore, other factors, like health-related quality of life, should play an important role in choosing the revascularization method.
METHODS: We compared 12-month health-related quality of life for high-risk patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation assigned to percutaneous coronary intervention (group A) versus coronary artery bypass graft surgery (group B). Patients had an episode of rest angina within 24h prior to admission and had to fulfil at least one of the criteria: (1) ST-segment depression (>or=0.05mV), (2) transient (<20min) ST-segment elevation or T-wave inversion (>or=0.1mV), (3) positive serum cardiac markers. Four hundred and ninety-six (91.34%) of 543 patients alive 12-months after index hospitalization completed a Short Form-36 (SF-36) health status survey. Group A comprised 392 patients and group B comprised 104 patients. We compared mental component summary (MCS) and physical component summary (PCS) scores from the SF-36 survey between analyzed groups.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences in MCS scores (47.21+/-12.30 vs. 46.60+/-11.3 in group A and group B, respectively, NS). PCS scores were lower in group A (38.30+/-11.10 vs. 42.64+/-9.76; p=0.003). Patients of group A had a higher rate of unstable angina (22.45 vs. 5.77%, p=0.0002) and repeated revascularization (12.76 vs. 1.92%, p=0.001) at 1 year. Patients of group A also had higher systolic and diastolic blood pressure during follow-up (138.17+/-20.41 vs. 133.47+/-19.21, p=0.04 and 82.48+/-11.32 vs. 77.25+/-16.17, p=0.0003, respectively). Systolic blood pressure was inversely associated with PCS scores in group A (Spearman's R= -0.18 p=0.0007).
CONCLUSIONS: This study has shown that there is a significant difference in health-related quality of life 12-months after percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass graft surgery. This difference arises from better physical function (physical component summary) for coronary artery bypass graft surgery patients compared with percutaneous coronary intervention patients. Despite impairment of the physical health status (physical component summary), the mental health status (mental component summary) remained similar in both groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15848330     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2005.01.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  8 in total

1.  Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in acute coronary syndrome: a clinical analysis.

Authors:  Kaan Kaya; Raif Cavolli; Alpaslan Telli; Mehmet Fazil Tolga Soyal; Alp Aslan; Gökhan Gokaslan; Sahin Mursel; Refik Tasoz
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 1.637

2.  Quality of life one year after coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

Authors:  H R Taghipour; M H Naseri; R Safiarian; Y Dadjoo; B Pishgoo; H A Mohebbi; L Daftari Besheli; M Malekzadeh; A Kabir
Journal:  Iran Red Crescent Med J       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 0.611

Review 3.  Comparison of the Postprocedural Quality of Life between Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Kaneez Fatima; Mohammad Yousuf-Ul-Islam; Mehreen Ansari; Faizan Imran Bawany; Muhammad Shahzeb Khan; Akash Khetpal; Neelam Khetpal; Muhammad Nawaz Lashari; Mohammad Hussham Arshad; Raamish Bin Amir; Hoshang Rustom Kakalia; Qaiser Hasan Zaidi; Sharmeen Kamran Mian; Bahram Kazani
Journal:  Cardiol Res Pract       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 1.866

Review 4.  Coronary revascularization in the elderly with stable angina.

Authors:  Kirill Lenarovich Kozlov; Aleksandr Andreevich Bogachev
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 3.327

5.  Echocardiographic Parameters as Life Quality Predictors in Patients After Myocardial Infarction Treated with Different Methods.

Authors:  Alen Dzubur; Mevludin Mekic; Senad Pesto; Naser Nabil
Journal:  Med Arch       Date:  2016-12

6.  Low health-related quality of life is a predictor of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with chronic nonischemic heart failure.

Authors:  Bożena Szyguła-Jurkiewicz; Michał Zakliczyński; Aleksander Owczarek; Robert Partyka; Mateusz Mościński; Robert Pudlo; Marcin Kaczmarczyk; Marian Zembala; Lech Poloński
Journal:  Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol       Date:  2014-09-28

Review 7.  Tools for assessing quality of life in cardiology and cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Karolina Gierlaszyńska; Robert Pudlo; Izabela Jaworska; Kamila Byrczek-Godula; Mariusz Gąsior
Journal:  Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol       Date:  2016-03-30

8.  Health-related Quality of Life Increases After First-time Acute Myocardial Infarction: a Population-based Study.

Authors:  Aleksandra Gąsecka; Bartholomew Rzepa; Aleksandra Skwarek; Agata Ćwiek; Kinga Pluta; Łukasz Szarpak; Miłosz J Jaguszewski; Tomasz Mazurek; Janusz Kochman; Grzegorz Opolski; Krzysztof J Filipiak; Krzysztof Gąsecki
Journal:  Zdr Varst       Date:  2021-12-27
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.