Literature DB >> 15847431

Homodinuclear iron thiolate nitrosyl compounds [(ON)Fe(S,S-C6H4)2 Fe(NO)2]- and [(ON)Fe(SO2,S-C6H4)(S,S-C6H4)Fe(NO)2]- with {Fe(NO)}7-{Fe(NO)2}9 electronic coupling: new members of a class of dinitrosyl iron complexes.

Hao-Wen Chen1, Chin-Wei Lin, Chiao-Chun Chen, Li-Bo Yang, Ming-Hsi Chiang, Wen-Feng Liaw.   

Abstract

Reaction of Fe(CO)2(NO)2 and [(ON)Fe(S,S-C6H3R)2]- (R = H (1), CH3 (1-Me))/[(ON)Fe(SO2,S-C6H4)(S,S-C6H4)]- (4) in THF afforded the diiron thiolate/sulfinate nitrosyl complexes [(ON)Fe(S,S-C6H3R)2 Fe(NO)2]- (R = H (2), CH3 (2-Me)) and [(ON)Fe(S,SO2-C6H4)(S,S-C6H4)Fe(NO)2]- (3), respectively. The average N-O bond lengths ([Fe(NO)2] unit) of 1.167(3) and 1.162(4) A in complexes 2 and 3 are consistent with the average N-O bond length of 1.165 A observed in the other structurally characterized dinitrosyl iron complexes with an {Fe(NO)2}9 core. The lower nu(15NO) value (1682 cm(-1) (KBr)) of the [(15NO)FeS4] fragment of [(15NO)Fe(S,S-C6H3CH3)2 Fe(NO)2]- (2-Me-15N), compared to that of [(15NO)Fe(S,S-C6H3CH3)2]- (1-Me-15N) (1727 cm(-1) (KBr)), implicates the electron transfer from {Fe(NO)2}10 Fe(CO)2(NO)2 to complex 1-Me/1 may occur in the process of formation of complex 2-Me/2. Then, the electronic structures of the [(NO)FeS4] and [S2Fe(NO)2] cores of complexes 2, 2-Me, and 3 were best assigned according to the Feltham-Enemark notation as the {Fe(NO)}7-{Fe(NO)2}9 coupling (antiferromagnetic interaction with a J value of -182 cm(-1) for complex 2) to account for the absence of paramagnetism (SQUID) and the EPR signal. On the basis of Fe-N(O) and N-O bond distances, the dinitrosyliron {L2Fe(NO)2} derivatives having an Fe-N(O) distance of approximately 1.670 A and a N-O distance of approximately 1.165 A are best assigned as {Fe(NO)2}9 electronic structures, whereas the Fe-N(O) distance of approximately 1.650 A and N-O distance of approximately 1.190 A probably imply an {Fe(NO)2}10 electronic structure.

Entities:  

Year:  2005        PMID: 15847431     DOI: 10.1021/ic049105j

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Inorg Chem        ISSN: 0020-1669            Impact factor:   5.165


  7 in total

1.  Sulfur oxygenation in biomimetic non-heme iron-thiolate complexes.

Authors:  Alison C McQuilken; David P Goldberg
Journal:  Dalton Trans       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 4.390

Review 2.  Synthetic methodology for preparation of dinitrosyl iron complexes.

Authors:  Szu-Liang Cho; Cheng-Jhe Liao; Tsai-Te Lu
Journal:  J Biol Inorg Chem       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 3.358

3.  Iron(II)-thiolate S-oxygenation by O2: synthetic models of cysteine dioxygenase.

Authors:  Yunbo Jiang; Leland R Widger; Gary D Kasper; Maxime A Siegler; David P Goldberg
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 15.419

4.  The Preparation, Structural Characteristics, and Physical Chemical Properties of Metal-Nitrosyl Complexes.

Authors:  Lauren R Holloway; Lijuan Li
Journal:  Struct Bond       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 1.176

5.  Recent Advances in Multinuclear Metal Nitrosyl Complexes.

Authors:  Lijuan Li; Linlin Li
Journal:  Coord Chem Rev       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 22.315

6.  Nitrosyl derivatives of diiron(I) dithiolates mimic the structure and Lewis acidity of the [FeFe]-hydrogenase active site.

Authors:  Matthew T Olsen; Maurizio Bruschi; Luca De Gioia; Thomas B Rauchfuss; Scott R Wilson
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2008-08-14       Impact factor: 15.419

7.  Spin-state-dependent oxygen sensitivity of iron dithiolates: sulfur oxygenation or disulfide formation.

Authors:  Martin G O'Toole; Majda Kreso; Pawel M Kozlowski; Mark S Mashuta; Craig A Grapperhaus
Journal:  J Biol Inorg Chem       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 3.358

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.