Literature DB >> 15847246

Evaluation of literacy level of patient education pages in health-related journals.

Nancy Cotugna1, Connie E Vickery, Kara M Carpenter-Haefele.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reading level of patient education material from selected current health care journals. Ten patient education pages from a variety of health care journals were entered into a Microsoft Word program. Applying the Flesch-Kincaid readability formula available from Microsoft Word, a reading level for each page was established and compared to recommended standards. Only 2 of 10 patient education pages fell within the recommended reading levels for health-related materials, and 5 of 10 were above the estimated mean U.S. reading level of 8th grade. A 5th to 6th grade level is recommended for patient education materials. This study suggests that although it is known that low health literacy is a widespread problem, it is not always considered when patient-targeted materials are developed. Health care professionals need to become more active in addressing the literacy needs of the intended receiver of written health-related information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15847246     DOI: 10.1007/s10900-004-1959-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Community Health        ISSN: 0094-5145


  10 in total

1.  Readability standards for informed-consent forms as compared with actual readability.

Authors:  Michael K Paasche-Orlow; Holly A Taylor; Frederick L Brancati
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-02-20       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  A new readability yardstick.

Authors:  R FLESCH
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  1948-06

Review 3.  Readability of patient education materials: implications for clinical practice.

Authors:  J Albright; C de Guzman; P Acebo; D Paiva; M Faulkner; J Swanson
Journal:  Appl Nurs Res       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 2.257

4.  Comparison of literacy level of patients in a VA arthritis center with the reading level required by educational materials.

Authors:  I Larson; H R Schumacher
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res       Date:  1992-03

Review 5.  Communicating with patients who have limited literacy skills. Report of the National Work Group on Literacy and Health.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 0.493

6.  Designing and evaluating diabetes education material for American Indians.

Authors:  G M Hosey; W L Freeman; F Stracqualursi; D Gohdes
Journal:  Diabetes Educ       Date:  1990 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.140

7.  How reliable is computerized assessment of readability?

Authors:  S L Mailloux; M E Johnson; D G Fisher; T J Pettibone
Journal:  Comput Nurs       Date:  1995 Sep-Oct

8.  Literacy in patients with a chronic disease: systemic lupus erythematosus and the reading level of patient education materials.

Authors:  M Hearth-Holmes; P W Murphy; T C Davis; I Nandy; C G Elder; L H Broadwell; R E Wolf
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.666

9.  Health literacy: report of the Council on Scientific Affairs. Ad Hoc Committee on Health Literacy for the Council on Scientific Affairs, American Medical Association.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-02-10       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Readability levels of selected hypercholesterolemia patient education literature.

Authors:  S L Merritt; M A Gates; K Skiba
Journal:  Heart Lung       Date:  1993 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.210

  10 in total
  68 in total

Review 1.  Assessing readability of patient education materials: current role in orthopaedics.

Authors:  Sameer Badarudeen; Sanjeev Sabharwal
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Readability of online patient education materials from the AAOS web site.

Authors:  Sanjeev Sabharwal; Sameer Badarudeen; Shebna Unes Kunju
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-03-07       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Tools for assessing readability and quality of health-related Web sites.

Authors:  Randi Shedlosky-Shoemaker; Amy Curry Sturm; Muniba Saleem; Kimberly M Kelly
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2008-10-21       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Does the quality, accuracy, and readability of information about lateral epicondylitis on the internet vary with the search term used?

Authors:  Christopher J Dy; Samuel A Taylor; Ronak M Patel; Moira M McCarthy; Timothy R Roberts; Aaron Daluiski
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2012-12

5.  Health Literacy and Education Predict Nutrient Quality of Diet of Socioeconomically Diverse, Urban Adults.

Authors:  Marie F Kuczmarski; Erica L Adams; Nancy Cotugna; Ryan T Pohlig; May A Beydoun; Alan B Zonderman; Michele K Evans
Journal:  J Epidemiol Prev Med       Date:  2016-04-15

6.  Evaluation of the Quality, Accuracy, and Readability of Online Patient Resources for the Management of Articular Cartilage Defects.

Authors:  Dean Wang; Rohit G Jayakar; Natalie L Leong; Michael P Leathers; Riley J Williams; Kristofer J Jones
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 4.634

7.  Acute skin toxicity-related, out-of-pocket expenses in patients with breast cancer treated with external beam radiotherapy: a descriptive, exploratory study.

Authors:  Julie B Schnur; Joshua Graff Zivin; David M K Mattson; Sheryl Green; Lina H Jandorf; A Gabriella Wernicke; Guy H Montgomery
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-03-18       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  Quality and readability of online patient information regarding sclerotherapy for venous malformations.

Authors:  Jonathan H Pass; Amani H Patel; Sam Stuart; Alex M Barnacle; Premal A Patel
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2018-02-02

9.  Understood? Evaluating the readability and understandability of intranasal corticosteroid delivery instructions.

Authors:  Saangyoung E Lee; William C Brown; Mark W Gelpi; Adam J Kimple; Brent A Senior; Adam M Zanation; Brian D Thorp; Charles S Ebert
Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 3.858

10.  Messages to Motivate Human Papillomavirus Vaccination: National Studies of Parents and Physicians.

Authors:  Teri L Malo; Melissa B Gilkey; Megan E Hall; Parth D Shah; Noel T Brewer
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 4.254

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.