Literature DB >> 15846752

Primary stenting versus primary balloon angioplasty for treating acute myocardial infarction.

A J Nordmann1, H Bucher, P Hengstler, T Harr, J Young.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Balloon angioplasty following myocardial infarction (MI) reduces death, non-fatal MI and stroke compared to thrombolytic reperfusion. However up to 50% of patients experience restenosis and 3% to 5% recurrent myocardial infarction. Therefore, primary stenting may offer additional benefits compared to balloon angioplasty in patients with acute myocardial infarction.
OBJECTIVES: To examine whether primary stenting compared to primary balloon angioplasty reduces clinical outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Pascal, Index medicus and The Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (The Cochrane Library) from 1979 to March 2002. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials of primary stenting or balloon angioplasty prior to the invasive procedure; intervention in native coronary arteries within 24 hours after onset of symptoms of myocardial infarction; report of death or reinfarction; and follow-up of at least 1 month. Trials were excluded when randomisation occurred after an invasive procedure and if they exclusively included patients with cardiogenic shock. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently selected and extracted data from identified trials. Outcomes included mortality, reinfarction, coronary artery bypass grafting, target vessel revascularization, need for vascular repair or blood transfusion. Peto odds ratios were calculated. To explore the stability of the overall treatment effect various sensitivity analyses were performed. MAIN
RESULTS: We included nine trials of 4433 participants. Odds ratios for mortality after stenting compared to balloon angioplasty at 30 days, 6 and 12 months were 1.16 (95% CI 0.78 to 1.73), 1.27 (95% CI 0.89 to 1.83), and 1.06 (95% CI 0.77 to 1.45). At 30 days, 6 and 12 months odds ratios for reinfarction after stenting compared to balloon angioplasty were 0.52 (95% CI 0.31 to 0.87), 0.67 (95% CI 0.45 to 1.00), and 0.67 (95% CI 0.45-0.98) and odds ratio for target vessel revascularization after stenting compared to balloon angioplasty were 0.45 (95%CI 0.34 to 0.60), 0.42 (95% CI 0.35 to 0.51), and 0.47 (95% CI 0.38 to 0.57). The odds ratio for post-interventional bleeding complications after stenting compared to balloon angioplasty was 1.34 (95% CI 0.95 to 1.88; test of heterogeneity p > 0.1). AUTHORS'
CONCLUSIONS: There is no evidence to suggest that primary stenting reduces mortality when compared to balloon angioplasty. Stenting seems to be associated with a reduced risk of reinfarction and target vessel revascularization, but potential confounding due to unbalanced post-interventional antithrombotic/anticoagulant therapies can not be ruled out on basis of this review.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15846752     DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005313

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  13 in total

Review 1.  Stenting in Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Sanjog Kalra; Hemal Bhatt; Ajay J Kirtane
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2018 Jan-Mar

Review 2.  Percutaneous coronary interventions in facilities without cardiac surgery on site.

Authors:  Yuri B Pride; C Michael Gibson
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 3.  Examining and mitigating acellular hemoglobin vasoactivity.

Authors:  Pedro Cabrales
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 8.401

4.  Percutaneous treatment in acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Eduardo Alegría-Barrero; Raul Moreno
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2011-10-26

Review 5.  Intramyocardial haemorrhage after acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Ryanne P Betgem; Guus A de Waard; Robin Nijveldt; Aernout M Beek; Javier Escaned; Niels van Royen
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 32.419

6.  Coronary artery disease: revascularization strategies for patients with CAD and diabetes.

Authors:  G Robert Myers; William S Weintraub
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 7.  Drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents for acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Joshua Feinberg; Emil Eik Nielsen; Janette Greenhalgh; Juliet Hounsome; Naqash J Sethi; Sanam Safi; Christian Gluud; Janus C Jakobsen
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-08-23

8.  Drug-eluting stents in acute myocardial infarction: updated meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Authors:  Alban Dibra; Klaus Tiroch; Stefanie Schulz; Henning Kelbaek; Christian Spaulding; Gerrit J Laarman; Marco Valgimigli; Emilio Di Lorenzo; Christoph Kaiser; Ilkka Tierala; Julinda Mehilli; Gianluca Campo; Leif Thuesen; Maarten A Vink; Martin J Schalij; Roberto Violini; Albert Schömig; Adnan Kastrati
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2010-03-11       Impact factor: 5.460

9.  Therapeutic innovations, diminishing returns, and control rate preservation.

Authors:  David M Kent; Thomas A Trikalinos
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 10.  A quantitative estimate of bare-metal stenting compared with balloon angioplasty in patients with acute myocardial infarction: angiographic measures in relation to clinical outcome.

Authors:  Tone Svilaas; Iwan C C van der Horst; Felix Zijlstra
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.994

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.