Literature DB >> 1584613

How optometrists screen for glaucoma: a survey.

N P Strong1.   

Abstract

All optometrists registered and practising in Leicestershire were surveyed to find out what facilities they have for glaucoma screening, how patients are selected for screening, what tests are performed, and the criteria used for referring patients to the hospital ophthalmic service. All respondents examine the optic disc of all patients: 99% have tonometry available, but most use it selectively, on the basis of age, family history and disc appearance. Although 88% have field testing apparatus, this is usually not of a type likely to be effective in screening a general population: 38% have automated or semiautomated perimetry. The criterion level of IOP at which 80% of respondents would refer was 27 mm Hg in the absence of disc cupping, falling to 24 mm Hg if cupping was suspected. Over 80% would refer any patient with a field defect irrespective of IOP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1584613

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt        ISSN: 0275-5408            Impact factor:   3.117


  6 in total

Review 1.  Primary care and ophthalmology in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  S F Riad; J K G Dart; R J Cooling
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  How can we improve the detection of glaucoma?

Authors:  R P Crick; M W Tuck
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-03-04

Review 3.  Screening for glaucoma. Why is the disease underdetected?

Authors:  M W Tuck; R P Crick
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.923

4.  Reproducibility with the Keeler Pulsair 2000 non-contact tonometer.

Authors:  S A Vernon
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Assessment of patient opinions of different clinical tests used in the management of glaucoma.

Authors:  Stuart K Gardiner; Shaban Demirel
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  Glaucoma screening clinic in general practice: prevalence of occult disease, and resource implications.

Authors:  J H Sheldrick; A J Sharp
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 5.386

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.