Literature DB >> 15845715

Does femoral nerve catheter placement with stimulating catheters improve effective placement? A randomized, controlled, and observer-blinded trial.

Astrid M Morin1, Leopold H J Eberhart, Hagen K E Behnke, Stefanie Wagner, Tilo Koch, Udo Wolf, Walter Nau, Clemens Kill, Götz Geldner, Hinnerk Wulf.   

Abstract

Continuous peripheral nerve blocks offer the benefit of extended postoperative analgesia and accelerated functional recovery after major knee surgery. Conventional nerve localization is performed over a stimulating needle followed by blind insertion of the peripheral catheter. Correct catheter placement is confirmed by testing for satisfactory analgesia. Stimulating catheters offer the advantage of verifying correct placement close to the nerve during catheter placement. The aim of this randomized trial was to determine whether accurate catheter positioning under continuous stimulation accelerates the onset of sensory and motor block, improves the quality of postoperative analgesia, and enhances functional recovery. We compared femoral nerve catheters inserted under continuous stimulation with catheters that were placed using the conventional technique of blind advancement in 81 patients undergoing major knee surgery. Time of catheter placement was similar in both groups with 4 min (3/7.3; median, 25th/75th percentile) in the conventional group and 5 min (4/8.8) in the stimulating catheter group. In both groups, 42% of the catheters could be correctly placed (motor response of the patella with a current < or =0.5 mA) at first attempt. In 22 patients (58%) of the stimulating catheter group, the catheter had to be redirected 1-20 times, including 2 that could not be correctly placed within 20 min. The onset time of sensory and motor block was almost similar in both groups. There were no differences in the postoperative IV opioid consumption, and visual analog scale pain scores at rest and movement, or maximal bending and stretching of the knee joint during the 5 days after surgery. We conclude that with continuous femoral nerve blocks, blind catheter advancement is as effective as the stimulating catheter technique with respect to onset time of sensory and motor block as well as for postoperative pain reduction and functional outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15845715     DOI: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000151160.93288.0A

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  9 in total

Review 1.  [Concepts for perioperative pain therapy. A critical stocktaking].

Authors:  S Reichl; E Pogatzki-Zahn
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 2.  [Peripheral nerve blocks of the lower extremities. Clinical and practical aspects].

Authors:  A W Reske; A P Reske; V Meier; M Wiegel
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  Comparison of three techniques for ultrasound-guided femoral nerve catheter insertion: a randomized, blinded trial.

Authors:  Ehab Farag; Abdulkadir Atim; Raktim Ghosh; Maria Bauer; Thilak Sreenivasalu; Michael Kot; Andrea Kurz; Jarrod E Dalton; Edward J Mascha; Loran Mounir-Soliman; Sherif Zaky; Wael Ali Sakr Esa; Belinda L Udeh; Wael Barsoum; Daniel I Sessler
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 7.892

4.  Comparison of catheter tip migration using flexible and stimulating catheters inserted into the adductor canal in a cadaver model.

Authors:  Christopher A J Webb; T Edward Kim; Natasha Funck; Steven K Howard; T Kyle Harrison; Toni Ganaway; Heidi Keng; Edward R Mariano
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 2.078

5.  Continuous femoral versus posterior lumbar plexus nerve blocks for analgesia after hip arthroplasty: a randomized, controlled study.

Authors:  Brian M Ilfeld; Edward R Mariano; Sarah J Madison; Vanessa J Loland; NavParkash S Sandhu; Preetham J Suresh; Michael L Bishop; T Edward Kim; Michael C Donohue; Anna A Kulidjian; Scott T Ball
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2011-04-05       Impact factor: 5.108

6.  Continuous femoral nerve analgesia after unilateral total knee arthroplasty: stimulating versus nonstimulating catheters.

Authors:  Salim M Hayek; R Michael Ritchey; Daniel Sessler; Robert Helfand; Samuel Samuel; Meng Xu; Michael Beven; Demetrios Bourdakos; Wael Barsoum; Peter Brooks
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 5.108

7.  Comparative efficacy of ultrasound-guided and stimulating popliteal-sciatic perineural catheters for postoperative analgesia.

Authors:  Edward R Mariano; Vanessa J Loland; NavParkash S Sandhu; Michael L Bishop; Daniel K Lee; Alexandra K Schwartz; Paul J Girard; Eliza J Ferguson; Brian M Ilfeld
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 5.063

8.  [Pain therapy using stimulating catheters after total knee arthroplasty].

Authors:  P Fritze; S Anderl; A Marouf; R Cumlivski; Ch Müller; E Pernicka; G Redl
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.107

9.  The threshold elicited motor response via an in situ femoral nerve catheter predicts analgesia following total knee replacement.

Authors:  Antoun Nader; Mark C Kendall; Brian Chung; Kiran Chekka; Khalid Malik; Robert J McCarthy
Journal:  Local Reg Anesth       Date:  2010-09-14
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.