Literature DB >> 15844696

A retrospective review of enteroclysis in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding and chronic abdominal pain of undetermined etiology.

Aslam Malik1, Kathleen Lukaszewski, Dina Caroline, Henry Parkman, Joshua DeSipio, Felice Banson, Khalid Bazir, Lakshmi Reddy, Radhika Srinivasan, Robert Fisher, Larry Miller.   

Abstract

Our purpose was to determine the diagnostic utility of enteroclysis in the evaluation of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding and abdominal pain of unknown etiology. This is a retrospective review of 97 consecutive patients (mean age, 54.1+/-17.5 [SD] years; 49 male and 48 female) who underwent enteroclysis at Temple University Hospital from January 1994 to October 2001 for the evaluation of obscure GI bleeding or chronic abdominal pain of undetermined etiology. Prior to enteroclysis all patients had an EGD and colonoscopy, which were nondiagnostic for their symptoms. Sixty-three patients (64.9%) had enteroscopy performed prior to enteroclysis that was also negative. Enteroclysis results were defined as positive based on anatomical or functional abnormalities. Analysis of the data included the percentage yield of positive exams, the percentage of positive results per symptom category, and the percentage of patients with a change in clinical management based on positive enteroclysis results. Ninety-seven patients underwent enteroclysis. The indications for enteroclysis were obscure GI bleeding in 67 patients (69.1%) and chronic abdominal pain in 30 patients (30.9%). The number of positive exams was 19 (19.6%). Fourteen of the 67 patients with the indication of GI bleeding had a positive exam (21%), while 5 of the 30 patients with chronic abdominal pain had a positive result (16.7%). There was a change in clinical management due to the enteroclysis results in 10 patients: 7 patients with GI bleeding (10%) and 3 patients with chronic abdominal pain (10%). Positive enteroclysis findings included adhesions (7), filling defects and masses (5), strictures (2), small bowel diverticulosis (1), mucosal abnormalities (3), and a motility disorder (1). The overall positive yield for enteroclysis was 19.6%, with a yield of 16.7% for chronic abdominal pain and 21% for gastrointestinal bleeding. Enteroclysis results changed the clinical management in approximately 10% of the patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15844696     DOI: 10.1007/s10620-005-2551-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  20 in total

Review 1.  AGA technical review on the evaluation and management of occult and obscure gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  G R Zuckerman; C Prakash; M P Askin; B S Lewis
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 2.  Enteroclysis--a technique for examining the small bowel.

Authors:  J C Lappas; D D Maglinte
Journal:  Crit Rev Diagn Imaging       Date:  1990

Review 3.  The true yield of the small-intestinal barium study.

Authors:  D J Nolan
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 10.093

4.  Improved tolerance of enteroclysis by use of sedation.

Authors:  D D Maglinte; J C Lappas; S M Chernish; J C Kohne; F M Kelvin; A C Ng
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Enteroclysis in the evaluation of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  A Moch; H Herlinger; M L Kochman; M S Levine; S E Rubesin; I Laufer
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Technical factors for a more rapid enteroclysis.

Authors:  D D Maglinte; B T Burney; R E Miller
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  A modified technique for the double-contrast small bowel enema.

Authors:  H Herlinger
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1978-06-25

8.  Primary malignant tumors in the small bowel: a comparison of the small-bowel enema and conventional follow-through examination.

Authors:  J R Bessette; D D Maglinte; F M Kelvin; S M Chernish
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 9.  Small bowel radiography: how, when, and why?

Authors:  D D Maglinte; J C Lappas; F M Kelvin; D Rex; S M Chernish
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 10.  Imaging of the small bowel.

Authors:  J C Lappas; D D Maglinte
Journal:  Curr Opin Radiol       Date:  1991-06
View more
  6 in total

1.  A case of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding secondary to a small bowel gastrointestinal stromal tumor detected by magnetic resonance enterography.

Authors:  Fouad J Moawad; Todd R LaRock; Michael C Biondi; Brooks D Cash; Jayde E Kurland
Journal:  Medscape J Med       Date:  2008-11-18

2.  Enteroclysis: Current clinical value.

Authors:  Adel Maataoui; Thomas J Vogl; Volkmar Jacobi; M Fawad Khan
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2013-07-28

Review 3.  Capsule enteroscopy and radiology of the small intestine.

Authors:  Frans-Thomas Fork; Lars Aabakken
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-09-18       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Should capsule endoscopy be the first test for every obscure gastrointestinal bleeding?

Authors:  Chung Hyun Tae; Ki-Nam Shim
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2014-09-30

Review 5.  Irritable Bowel Syndrome: Clinical Manifestations, Dietary Influences, and Management.

Authors:  Ronald Ikechi; Bradford D Fischer; Joshua DeSipio; Sangita Phadtare
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2017-04-26

6.  Diagnostic Value and Safety of Emergency Single-Balloon Enteroscopy for Obscure Gastrointestinal Bleeding.

Authors:  Yipin Liu; Weiwei Jiang; Guoxun Chen; Yanqing Li
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 2.260

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.