Literature DB >> 15844672

Self-report measure of low back-related biomechanical exposures: clinical validation.

Colleen Daniels1, Grant D Huang, Michael Feuerstein, Mary Lopez.   

Abstract

Low back pain and symptoms are major contributors to ambulatory visits, economic burden, and reduced readiness among military personnel and employers in the civilian workplace as well. While a link between low back pain and biomechanical exposures has been established, efficient surveillance methods of such exposures are still needed. Furthermore, the utility of self-report measures for biomechanical exposures has not been examined extensively. The present cross-sectional study analyzed questionnaire data from US Army soldiers (n = 279) working in previously identified occupational specialties that were associated with high risk for low back pain and/or low back pain disability. Demographic characteristics, physical workload, health behaviors, and psychosocial factors were assessed in addition to self-reported workplace biomechanical exposures using the Job Related Physical Demands (JRPDs). Outcomes included self-reported low back pain severity, low back symptoms, functional limitations, and general physical health. The results indicated that the self-report measure of biomechanical exposure had a high degree of internal consistency (Cronbach alpha, 0.95). The JRPD index correlated with low back symptoms, pain intensity, function, and perceived work load using the Borg scale. Regression analyses indicated statistically significant associations between the JRPD and back pain specific pain severity and physical function, but not for general physical health (SF-12) after controlling for age, gender, educational level, job type, and reported exercise and work stress. Specifically, higher JRPD scores (representing greater biomechanical exposure) were associated with higher levels of pain intensity and functional limitations. Higher JRPD scores were found to place an individual at a greater likelihood for being a case with low back pain within the past 12 months (OR = 1.01 per point increase in scale-95%; range 38-152; CI = 1.00-1.02, p < or = 0.05). While future longitudinal studies of the JRPD determining the predictive validity of the measure are needed, the present study provides evidence of the utility of the JRPD for assessing biomechanical exposures associated with low back pain within high-risk jobs. The findings suggest that the JRPD may assist with surveillance efforts and be useful as a process and/or outcome measure in research related to occupational rehabilitation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15844672     DOI: 10.1007/s10926-005-1214-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Rehabil        ISSN: 1053-0487


  41 in total

Review 1.  Physical load during work and leisure time as risk factors for back pain.

Authors:  W E Hoogendoorn; M N van Poppel; P M Bongers; B W Koes; L M Bouter
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 5.024

2.  Chapter 9. Conclusions and recommendations of the DoD Injury Surveillance and Prevention Work Group.

Authors:  B H Jones; P J Amoroso; M L Canham; J B Schmitt; M B Weyandt
Journal:  Mil Med       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 1.437

3.  Individual and combined impacts of biomechanical and work organization factors in work-related musculoskeletal symptoms.

Authors:  Grant D Huang; Michael Feuerstein; Willem J Kop; Kenneth Schor; Freya Arroyo
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.214

4.  Working with low back pain: workplace and individual psychosocial determinants of limited duty and lost time.

Authors:  M Feuerstein; S M Berkowitz; A J Haufler; M S Lopez; G D Huang
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.214

5.  Assessment of mechanical exposure in ergonomic epidemiology.

Authors:  A J van der Beek; M H Frings-Dresen
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.402

6.  Psychophysical scaling with applications in physical work and the perception of exertion.

Authors:  G Borg
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 5.024

7.  Challenges in assessing risk factors in epidemiologic studies on back disorders.

Authors:  A Burdorf; M Rossignol; F A Fathallah; S H Snook; R F Herrick
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 2.214

8.  Occupational back disability in U.S. Army personnel.

Authors:  S M Berkowitz; M Feuerstein; M S Lopez; C A Peck
Journal:  Mil Med       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 1.437

9.  Musculoskeletal symptoms among electricians.

Authors:  K L Hunting; L S Welch; B A Cuccherini; L A Seiger
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 2.214

10.  Reliability of ratings of perceived effort regulation of exercise intensity.

Authors:  R G Eston; J G Williams
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 13.800

View more
  6 in total

1.  Perceived effort and low back pain in non-emergency ambulance workers: implications for rehabilitation.

Authors:  Grace Y T Tam; Simon S Yeung
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2006-06

2.  A coronary heart disease risk score based on patient-reported information.

Authors:  Arch G Mainous; Richelle J Koopman; Vanessa A Diaz; Charles J Everett; Peter W F Wilson; Barbara C Tilley
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2007-03-13       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  Caring-Related Chronic Low Back Pain and Associated Factors among Mothers of Children with Cerebral Palsy.

Authors:  Mehdi Ramezani; Jandark Eghlidi; Ehsan Pourghayoomi; Saeed Mohammadi
Journal:  Rehabil Res Pract       Date:  2020-12-30

4.  Job requirements and physical demands (JRPD) questionnaire: cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation in Iranian Army personnel with chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Mehdi Ramezani; Ehsan Pourghayoomi; Ghorban Taghizadeh
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  The prospective effects of workplace violence on physicians' job satisfaction and turnover intentions: the buffering effect of job control.

Authors:  Tarja Heponiemi; Anne Kouvonen; Marianna Virtanen; Jukka Vänskä; Marko Elovainio
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  Effects of Ergomotor Intervention on Improving Occupational Health in Workers with Work-Related Neck-Shoulder Pain.

Authors:  Billy C L So; Grace P Y Szeto; Rufina W L Lau; Jie Dai; Sharon M H Tsang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.