Literature DB >> 15844670

Workstyle: development of a measure of response to work in those with upper extremity pain.

Michael Feuerstein1, Rena A Nicholas, Grant D Huang, Amy J Haufler, Glenn Pransky, Michele Robertson.   

Abstract

Workstyle or the behavioral, cognitive, and physiological response that can occur in some individuals to increases in work demands has been proposed to help explain the link between ergonomic and psychosocial factors in the exacerbation of work-related upper extremity symptoms. Currently, there is no measure of this construct, hindering research on its potential link to work related upper extremity problems in the workplace. The present study describes the development and psychometric properties of a measure of workstyle. Questionnaire items reflecting dimensions of workstyle as per the original conceptualization were generated primarily through focus groups with office workers and separate groups held with occupational physicians, physical therapists, occupational health psychologists, and experts in ergonomics, behavioral science, and human factors. Items created through this process were then administered to 282 symptomatic and asymptomatic office workers. Measures of job stress, ergonomic risk, upper extremity symptoms, and functional limitations were also obtained. The workstyle questionnaire was divided into two broad dimensions: Characteristic responses to work and Response to increased work demands. The scale development process as indicated by factor analysis yielded subscales that are theoretically consistent with the workstyle construct. These subscales include: working through pain, social reactivity at work, limited workplace support, deadlines/pressure, self imposed work pace/workload, breaks, mood, pain/tension, autonomic response, and numbness tingling. The internal consistency of these subscales varied from 0.61 to 0.91, n = 282 while the test-retest (3 weeks) reliability for the various subscales ranged from r = 0.68 to 0.89, n = 143. A total workstyle score was computed that excluded the pain/tension and numbness/tingling subscales to avoid circular reasoning in terms of the measure's relationship to outcomes of pain and functional limitations. The total score was stable over time and provided unique variance in relation to traditional measures of job stress. Total workstyle score was significantly associated with higher levels of pain, and greater functional limitations. Dimensions of the workstyle construct were identified. The workstyle measure possesses acceptable psychometric properties in office workers who work with computers. This measure can be used in future studies on the interaction of psychosocial and ergonomic factors in the exacerbation of upper extremity pain and functional limitation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15844670     DOI: 10.1007/s10926-005-3420-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Rehabil        ISSN: 1053-0487


  24 in total

Review 1.  Pathophysiology of nerve compression syndromes: response of peripheral nerves to loading.

Authors:  D Rempel; L Dahlin; G Lundborg
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Measurement properties of a self-report index of ergonomic exposures for use in an office work environment.

Authors:  Dana Dane; Michael Feuerstein; Grant D Huang; Lennart Dimberg; Danielle Ali; Andrew Lincoln
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.162

3.  Biobehavioral mechanisms of work-related upper extremity disorders: a new agenda for research and practice.

Authors:  Michael Feuerstein
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.214

4.  Biomechanical factors affecting upper extremity cumulative trauma disorders in sign language interpreters.

Authors:  M Feuerstein; T E Fitzgerald
Journal:  J Occup Med       Date:  1992-03

5.  Computer keyboard force and upper extremity symptoms.

Authors:  M Feuerstein; T Armstrong; P Hickey; A Lincoln
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 2.162

6.  Fear-avoidance beliefs and catastrophizing: occurrence and risk factor in back pain and ADL in the general population.

Authors:  Nina Buer; Steven J Linton
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 6.961

7.  Psychophysical scaling with applications in physical work and the perception of exertion.

Authors:  G Borg
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 5.024

8.  Exposure to job stress--a new psychometric instrument.

Authors:  J J Hurrell; M A McLaney
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 5.024

9.  A prospective study of computer users: I. Study design and incidence of musculoskeletal symptoms and disorders.

Authors:  Fredric Gerr; Michele Marcus; Cindy Ensor; David Kleinbaum; Susan Cohen; Alicia Edwards; Eileen Gentry; Daniel J Ortiz; Carolyn Monteilh
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.214

10.  The Job Content Questionnaire (JCQ): an instrument for internationally comparative assessments of psychosocial job characteristics.

Authors:  R Karasek; C Brisson; N Kawakami; I Houtman; P Bongers; B Amick
Journal:  J Occup Health Psychol       Date:  1998-10
View more
  19 in total

Review 1.  Work-related outcome assessment instruments.

Authors:  Achim Elfering
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-11-23       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Secondary prevention of work-related upper extremity disorders: recommendations from the Annapolis conference.

Authors:  Michael Feuerstein; Cherise B Harrington
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2006-09

Review 3.  Epidemiology of work related neck and upper limb problems: psychosocial and personal risk factors (part I) and effective interventions from a bio behavioural perspective (part II).

Authors:  P M Bongers; S Ijmker; S van den Heuvel; B M Blatter
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2006-09

Review 4.  The impact of a computerized work environment on professional occupational groups and behavioural and physiological risk factors for musculoskeletal symptoms: a literature review.

Authors:  Karin Lindgren Griffiths; Martin G Mackey; Barbara J Adamson
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2007-12

5.  Workstyle and overcommitment in relation to neck and upper limb symptoms.

Authors:  Swenne G van den Heuvel; Allard J van der Beek; Birgitte M Blatter; Paulien M Bongers
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2007

6.  Work-related musculoskeletal symptoms in surgeons.

Authors:  Grace P Y Szeto; Pei Ho; Albert C W Ting; Jensen T C Poon; Stephen W K Cheng; Raymond C C Tsang
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2009-04-21

7.  Chinese translation and cross cultural adaptation of the workstyle short form.

Authors:  Andy S K Cheng; Grace P Y Szeto; Yan Wen Xu; Michael Feuerstein
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2014-12

8.  Workstyle and Musculoskeletal Discomfort (MSD): Exploring the Influence of Work Culture in Malaysia.

Authors:  Ismail Maakip; Tessa Keegel; Jodi Oakman
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2015-12

9.  Individual, physical and psychological risk factors for neck pain in Australian office workers: a 1-year longitudinal study.

Authors:  Julia M Hush; Zoe Michaleff; Christopher G Maher; Kathryn Refshauge
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Work related risk factors for neck, shoulder and arms complaints: a cohort study among Dutch computer office workers.

Authors:  Shahla Eltayeb; J Bart Staal; Amar Hassan; Rob A de Bie
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2009-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.