Literature DB >> 15843832

Tobacco tax as a health protecting policy: a brief review of the New Zealand evidence.

Nick Wilson1, George Thomson.   

Abstract

AIM: To review the evidence relating to tobacco taxation as a health and equity protecting policy for New Zealand.
METHODS: Searches of Medline, EconLit, ECONbase, Index NZ, and library databases for literature on tobacco taxation.
RESULTS: The New Zealand evidence indicates that increases in tobacco prices are associated with decreases in tobacco consumption in the general population over the long term. This finding comes from multiple studies relating to: tobacco supplies released from bond, supermarket tobacco sales, household tobacco expenditure data, trends in smoking prevalence data, and from data on calls to the Quitline service. For the 1988-1998 period, the overall price elasticity of demand for all smoking households was estimated to be such that a 10% price increase would lower demand by 5% to 8%. Two studies are suggestive that increased tobacco affordability is also a risk factor for higher youth smoking rates. There is evidence from two studies that tobacco price increases reduce tobacco consumption in some low-income groups and one other study indicates that tobacco taxation is likely to be providing overall health benefit to low-income New Zealanders. These findings are broadly consistent with the very large body of scientific evidence from other developed countries.
CONCLUSIONS: There is good evidence that tobacco taxation is associated with reduced tobacco consumption in the New Zealand setting, and some limited evidence for equity benefits from taxation increases. Substantial scope exists for improving tobacco taxation policy in New Zealand to better protect public health and to improve equity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15843832

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Z Med J        ISSN: 0028-8446


  9 in total

Review 1.  Environmental and societal influences acting on cardiovascular risk factors and disease at a population level: a review.

Authors:  Clara Kayei Chow; Karen Lock; Koon Teo; S V Subramanian; Martin McKee; Salim Yusuf
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 7.196

2.  Stability of smoking status in the US population: a longitudinal investigation.

Authors:  Andrea H Weinberger; Corey E Pilver; Carolyn M Mazure; Sherry A McKee
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 6.526

3.  Increased cigarette tax is associated with reductions in alcohol consumption in a longitudinal U.S. sample.

Authors:  Kelly C Young-Wolff; Karin A Kasza; Andrew J Hyland; Sherry A McKee
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2013-08-09       Impact factor: 3.455

4.  Price elasticity of demand of non-cigarette tobacco products: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mohammed Jawad; John Tayu Lee; Stanton Glantz; Christopher Millett
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 7.552

5.  Implementation failures in the use of two New Zealand laws to control the tobacco industry: 1989-2005.

Authors:  George Thomson; Nick Wilson
Journal:  Aust New Zealand Health Policy       Date:  2005-12-14

6.  What potential has tobacco control for reducing health inequalities? The New Zealand situation.

Authors:  Nick Wilson; Tony Blakely; Martin Tobias
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2006-11-02

7.  The effect of out-of-pocket costs and financial rewards in a discrete choice experiment: an application to lifestyle programs.

Authors:  Johanna O P Wanders; Jorien Veldwijk; G Ardine de Wit; Huberta E Hart; Paul F van Gils; Mattijs S Lambooij
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2014-08-23       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Towards a comprehensive global approach to prevention and control of NCDs.

Authors:  Martin McKee; Andy Haines; Shah Ebrahim; Peter Lamptey; Mauricio L Barreto; Don Matheson; Helen L Walls; Sunia Foliaki; J Jaime Miranda; Oyun Chimeddamba; Luis Garcia-Marcos; Paolo Vineis; Neil Pearce
Journal:  Global Health       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 4.185

9.  Can public health policies on alcohol and tobacco reduce a cancer epidemic? Australia's experience.

Authors:  Heng Jiang; Michael Livingston; Robin Room; Yong Gan; Dallas English; Richard Chenhall
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 8.775

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.