Literature DB >> 15843654

Macroinvertebrate communities in agriculturally impacted southern Illinois streams: patterns with riparian vegetation, water quality, and in-stream habitat quality.

Mandy L Stone1, Matt R Whiles, Jeremy A Webber, Karl W J Williard, John D Reeve.   

Abstract

Relationships between riparian land cover, in-stream habitat, water chemistry, and macroinvertebrates were examined in headwater streams draining an agricultural region of Illinois. Macroinvertebrates and organic matter were collected monthly for one year from three intensively monitored streams with a gradient of riparian forest cover (6, 22, and 31% of riparian area). Bioassessments and physical habitat analyses were also performed in these three streams and 12 other nearby headwater streams. The intensively monitored site with the least riparian forest cover had significantly greater percent silt substrates than the sites with medium and high forest cover, and significantly higher very fine organics in substrates than the medium and high forested sites. Macroinvertebrates were abundant in all streams, but communities reflected degraded conditions; noninsect groups, mostly oligochaetes and copepods, dominated density and oligochaetes and mollusks, mostly Sphaerium and Physella, dominated biomass. Of insects, dipterans, mostly Chironomidae, dominated density and dipterans and coleopterans were important contributors to biomass. Collector-gatherers dominated functional structure in all three intensively monitored sites, indicating that functional structure metrics may not be appropriate for assessing these systems. The intensively monitored site with lowest riparian forest cover had significantly greater macroinvertebrate density and biomass, but lowest insect density and biomass. Density and biomass of active collector-filterers (mostly Sphaerium) decreased with increasing riparian forest. Hilsenhoff scores from all 15 sites were significantly correlated with in-stream habitat scores, percent riparian forest, and orthophosphate concentrations, and multiple regression indicated that in-stream habitat was the primary factor influencing biotic integrity. Our results show that these "drainage ditches" harbor abundant macroinvertebrates that are typical of degraded conditions, but that they can reflect gradients of conditions in and around these streams.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15843654     DOI: 10.2134/jeq2004.0305

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Qual        ISSN: 0047-2425            Impact factor:   2.751


  9 in total

1.  Occurrence of maize detritus and a transgenic insecticidal protein (Cry1Ab) within the stream network of an agricultural landscape.

Authors:  Jennifer L Tank; Emma J Rosi-Marshall; Todd V Royer; Matt R Whiles; Natalie A Griffiths; Therese C Frauendorf; David J Treering
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-09-27       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Rehabilitating agricultural streams in Australia with wood: a review.

Authors:  Rebecca E Lester; Andrew J Boulton
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2008-06-17       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Relations between macroinvertebrates, nutrients, and water quality criteria in wadeable streams of Maryland, USA.

Authors:  Matthew J Ashton; Raymond P Morgan; Scott Stranko
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Do Riparian Buffers Protect Stream Invertebrate Communities in South American Atlantic Forest Agricultural Areas?

Authors:  L Hunt; N Marrochi; C Bonetto; M Liess; D F Buss; C Vieira da Silva; M-C Chiu; V H Resh
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 3.266

5.  Assessing ecological water quality with macroinvertebrates and fish: a case study from a small Mediterranean river.

Authors:  Maria Th Cheimonopoulou; Dimitra C Bobori; Ioannis Theocharopoulos; Maria Lazaridou
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2010-12-19       Impact factor: 3.266

6.  Toxins in transgenic crop byproducts may affect headwater stream ecosystems.

Authors:  E J Rosi-Marshall; J L Tank; T V Royer; M R Whiles; M Evans-White; C Chambers; N A Griffiths; J Pokelsek; M L Stephen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-10-08       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Fish Community Structure and Diet Responses to Newbury Weirs in a Low-Gradient River.

Authors:  Sophia M Bonjour; Heidi M Rantala; Micah G Bennett; Matt R Whiles
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 3.266

8.  Genetically modified crops and aquatic ecosystems: considerations for environmental risk assessment and non-target organism testing.

Authors:  Keri Carstens; Jennifer Anderson; Pamela Bachman; Adinda De Schrijver; Galen Dively; Brian Federici; Mick Hamer; Marco Gielkens; Peter Jensen; William Lamp; Stefan Rauschen; Geoff Ridley; Jörg Romeis; Annabel Waggoner
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2011-11-26       Impact factor: 2.788

9.  Regression Tree Analysis for Stream Biological Indicators Considering Spatial Autocorrelation.

Authors:  Mi-Young Kim; Sang-Woo Lee
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 3.390

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.