Literature DB >> 1584355

Management of unruptured intracranial arteriovenous malformations: a decision analysis.

R G Auger1, D O Wiebers.   

Abstract

The management of unruptured intracranial arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) is controversial. Some authorities favor elective excision of the AVM before it bleeds, whereas others advise nonintervention unless the AVM bleeds, at which time surgical excision is performed in those who survive. A Markov model was developed that stimulates a clinical trial in which cohorts of patients with unruptured AVMs were assigned to either elective excision of their AVMs or conservative treatment (unless the AVM bled). Incremental utilities for both strategies were calculated at the end of each year after the beginning of the trial and are expressed as quality and risk-adjusted life years. The process was continued until all members of the cohorts had died. The mean quality and risk-adjusted life expectancy for members of a cohort was calculated by dividing the total number of quality and risk-adjusted life years the cohort had accumulated by the size of the cohort. If the baseline values for surgical complications were used in the computation, the quality and risk-adjusted life expectancy for the surgical cohorts was at least 1 quality and risk-adjusted life year greater than for nonsurgical cohorts up to age 44. If a more favorable complication rate were used, elective surgery could benefit selected patients in their early 60s when the location and configuration of the AVM was favorable. Elective surgical resection is justified in many instances before rupture, particularly in young patients who have intracranial AVMs that have a favorable location, size, and venous drainage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1584355     DOI: 10.1227/00006123-199204000-00015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  6 in total

1.  Changes in AVM angio-architecture and hemodynamics after stereotactic radiosurgery assessed by dynamic MRA and phase contrast flow assessments: a prospective follow-up study.

Authors:  Lydia Schuster; E Schenk; F Giesel; T Hauser; L Gerigk; A Zabel-Du-Bois; Marco Essig
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Brain arteriovenous malformations: assessment with dynamic MR digital subtraction angiography.

Authors:  P D Griffiths; N Hoggard; D J Warren; I D Wilkinson; B Anderson; C A Romanowski
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 3.  The combined management of cerebral arteriovenous malformations. Experience with 100 cases and review of the literature.

Authors:  R Deruty; I Pelissou-Guyotat; C Mottolese; Y Bascoulergue; D Amat
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.216

4.  Significance of factors contributing to surgical complications and to late outcome after elective surgery of cerebral arteriovenous malformations.

Authors:  C Schaller; J Schramm; D Haun
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 10.154

5.  Hypofractionated stereotactic radiosurgery in a large bilateral thalamic and Basal Ganglia arteriovenous malformation.

Authors:  Janet Lee; Tomoko Tanaka; Steven Westgate; Ashish Nanda; Marshall Cress; N Scott Litofsky
Journal:  Case Rep Neurol Med       Date:  2013-11-06

6.  Gamma Knife Radiosurgery Followed by Flow-Reductive Embolization for Ruptured Arteriovenous Malformation.

Authors:  Myung Ji Kim; So Hee Park; Keun Young Park; Hyun Ho Jung; Jong Hee Chang; Jin Woo Chang; Jae Whan Lee; Won Seok Chang
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-05-02       Impact factor: 4.241

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.