Literature DB >> 15843282

Validation of an insulin infusion nomogram for intensive glucose control in critically ill patients.

Clarence Chant1, Gail Wilson, Jan O Friedrich.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness, safety, and associated patient outcomes of a simplified, nurse-directed insulin nomogram designed to achieve intensive blood glucose level control (target range 90-144 mg/dl).
DESIGN: Prospective study with a retrospective control group.
SETTING: A medical-surgical intensive care unit (ICU) in a quaternary care, university-affiliated hospital in an urban center. PATIENTS: Eighty-six critically ill adult patients (aged>or=18 yrs) requiring blood glucose control, with 42 in the retrospective control group and 44 in the prospective nomogram group. INTERVENTION: Control patients received insulin subcutaneously or intravenously based on ad hoc insulin sliding scales; nomogram patients received intravenous insulin at a rate specified by the nomogram, based on capillary blood glucose levels measured at the bedside.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Insulin infusion in the prospective patient group was titrated by the bedside nurse based on a predefined nomogram to attain the target blood glucose level. The retrospective control group was used as a comparison to assess the safety and effectiveness of the nomogram. Fewer patients in the nomogram (32%) than control (67%) group had a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus on admission. Overall, blood glucose levels in the nomogram group were within the target range 52% of the time versus 20% in the control group (p<0.001). Morning blood glucose levels were significantly lower compared with the control group (mean+/-SD 128+/-32 vs 176+/-50 mg/dl, p<0.001). Nomogram patients achieved target blood glucose levels faster than control patients (median 15 vs 66 hrs, p<0.0001). This improved blood glucose control remained statistically significant after adjusting for baseline differences in diabetes status. Hyperglycemia occurred less often in the nomogram than the control group (14% vs 53%, p<0.0001), and hypoglycemia occurred more often (3.8% vs 2.2%, p=0.004). The frequency of severe hypoglycemia was similar in both groups (0.2% vs 0.4%, p=NS). Such control required slightly more blood glucose checks/day in the nomogram group (7.1+/-1.5 vs 5.8+/-1.1, p<0.001). No significant reduction was observed in duration of vasopressor or antibiotic therapy or in length of stay in the ICU.
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that intensive blood glucose control is achievable using a nurse-directed nomogram. This improved control was achieved, regardless of diabetes status of the patient, without substantially compromising safety or increasing resource use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15843282     DOI: 10.1592/phco.25.3.352.61594

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacotherapy        ISSN: 0277-0008            Impact factor:   4.705


  9 in total

Review 1.  Essential elements of the native glucoregulatory system, which, if appreciated, may help improve the function of glucose controllers in the intensive care unit setting.

Authors:  Leon DeJournett
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2010-01-01

2.  Implementation of the glucommander method of adjusting insulin infusions in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Sharon Yamashita; Emily Ng; Frank Brommecker; Jay Silverberg; Neill K J Adhikari
Journal:  Can J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2011-09

3.  Monitoring the Impact of Aggressive Glycemic Intervention during Critical Care after Cardiac Surgery with a Glycemic Expert System for Nurse-Implemented Euglycemia: The MAGIC GENIE Project.

Authors:  R Harsha Rao; Peter L Perreiah; Candace A Cunningham
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2021-03

4.  Design and implementation of GRIP: a computerized glucose control system at a surgical intensive care unit.

Authors:  Mathijs Vogelzang; Felix Zijlstra; Maarten W N Nijsten
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2005-12-19       Impact factor: 2.796

5.  Intensive insulin therapy in intensive care: an example of the struggle to implement evidence-based medicine.

Authors:  Marcus J Schultz; Annick A N M Royakkers; Marcel Levi; Hazra S Moeniralam; Peter E Spronk
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 11.069

6.  Performance of a 2-step insulin infusion protocol with adjustment of insulin doses for Asians in the medical intensive care unit following cardiothoracic surgery.

Authors:  Kazuma Ogiso; Nobuyuki Koriyama; Takahiko Obo; Akinori Tokito; Takayuki Ueno; Yoshihiko Nishio
Journal:  Diabetol Int       Date:  2018-06-15

7.  LOGIC-insulin algorithm-guided versus nurse-directed blood glucose control during critical illness: the LOGIC-1 single-center, randomized, controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Tom Van Herpe; Dieter Mesotten; Pieter J Wouters; Jeroen Herbots; Evy Voets; Jo Buyens; Bart De Moor; Greet Van den Berghe
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 19.112

8.  Impact of adalimumab on work participation in rheumatoid arthritis: comparison of an open-label extension study and a registry-based control group.

Authors:  M T Halpern; M A Cifaldi; T K Kvien
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 9.  A systematic review on quality indicators for tight glycaemic control in critically ill patients: need for an unambiguous indicator reference subset.

Authors:  Saeid Eslami; Nicolette F de Keizer; Evert de Jonge; Marcus J Schultz; Ameen Abu-Hanna
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2008-11-11       Impact factor: 9.097

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.