Literature DB >> 15843009

Osmotic tolerance of mouse spermatozoa from various genetic backgrounds: acrosome integrity, membrane integrity, and maintenance of motility.

Eric M Walters1, Hongsheng Men, Yuksel Agca, Steven F Mullen, Elizabeth S Critser, John K Critser.   

Abstract

All cells have an intrinsic biophysical property related to their ability to undergo osmotically driven volume changes. This project is of fundamental importance to our understanding of the basic cryobiology of mouse spermatozoa. The objectives of this study were to determine the osmotic tolerance limits for (1) motility, (2) acrosome integrity, and (3) membrane integrity of mouse spermatozoa from multiple genetic backgrounds including: C57BL/6, BALB/c, FVB, C3H, 129/SVS2 hsd B6C3F1, CB6F1, and ICR. The maintenance of acrosomal and plasma membrane integrity was not affected by genetic background (p=0.13), however, there was an interaction between genetic background and osmolality. In addition, acrosome and plasma membrane integrity was highly correlated within each strain (p<0.01). In contrast to acrosome and plasma membrane integrity, the motility of spermatozoa from different genetic backgrounds fell sharply on both sides of isosmolality, both with and without return to isosmotic conditions. Exposure to hyposmotic conditions caused morphological changes in the spermatozoa, which inhibited motility. However, this morphological change was not reversible in all cases when returned to isosmotic conditions. The ability to maintain motility in an anisosmotic media was affected by genetic background, osmolality as well as the interaction between genetic background and osmolality (p<0.05). In conclusion, mice with different genetic backgrounds appear to have similar tolerance to osmotic changes in terms of sperm acrosome and plasma membrane integrity; however, the ability to maintain motility differs between genetic backgrounds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15843009     DOI: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2005.01.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cryobiology        ISSN: 0011-2240            Impact factor:   2.487


  9 in total

1.  The Phospholipid Composition of Kangaroo Spermatozoa Verified by Mass Spectrometric Lipid Analysis.

Authors:  Kathrin M Engel; Jürgen Schiller; Karin Müller; Dirk Dannenberger; Ulrike Jakop
Journal:  Lipids       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 1.880

2.  Mathematical Modeling and Optimization of Cryopreservation in Single Cells.

Authors:  James D Benson
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

3.  Effects of various physical stress factors on mitochondrial function and reactive oxygen species in rat spermatozoa.

Authors:  Suhee Kim; Cansu Agca; Yuksel Agca
Journal:  Reprod Fertil Dev       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.311

4.  Production of piglets after cryopreservation of embryos using a centrifugation-based method for delipation without micromanipulation.

Authors:  Rongfeng Li; Clifton N Murphy; Lee Spate; David Wax; Clay Isom; August Rieke; Eric M Walters; Melissa Samuel; Randall S Prather
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2008-11-26       Impact factor: 4.285

5.  Effect of chilling on the motility and acrosomal integrity of rat sperm in the presence of various extenders.

Authors:  Omer Varisli; Cevdet Uguz; Cansu Agca; Yuksel Agca
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.232

6.  Identification of quantitative trait loci associated with the susceptibility of mouse spermatozoa to cryopreservation.

Authors:  Jinsha Liu; Keiji Mochida; Ayumi Hasegawa; Kimiko Inoue; Atsuo Ogura
Journal:  J Reprod Dev       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 2.214

7.  Easy and quick (EQ) sperm freezing method for urgent preservation of mouse strains.

Authors:  Keiji Mochida; Ayumi Hasegawa; Daiki Shikata; Nobuhiko Itami; Masashi Hada; Naomi Watanabe; Toshiko Tomishima; Atsuo Ogura
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Improved assessment of frozen/thawed mouse spermatozoa using fluorescence microscopy.

Authors:  Ann-Kathrin Diercks; Heinrich F Bürgers; Anna Schwab; Johannes Schenkel
Journal:  J Vet Sci       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.672

9.  Microdroplet in vitro fertilization can reduce the number of spermatozoa necessary for fertilizing oocytes.

Authors:  Ayumi Hasegawa; Keiji Mochida; Toshiko Tomishima; Kimiko Inoue; Atsuo Ogura
Journal:  J Reprod Dev       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 2.214

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.