Literature DB >> 15842078

Integrating health and social care: implications for joint working and community care outcomes for older people.

Barbara Davey1, Enid Levin, Steve Iliffe, Kalpa Kharicha.   

Abstract

In England, the theme of promoting collaborative working between social and primary health care remains high on the policy agenda. The underlying assumption, largely untested, is that a greater degree of structural integration benefits service users. This paper reports the findings from a feasibility study comparing two models of joint working and examining the relative impact of personal characteristics, service use and co-location on the likelihood of older people remaining in the community. Baseline standardised interviews with 79 older people aged 75 + with complex needs in two social services departments were carried out following referral, covering social circumstances, physical and mental health and services received, with follow-up interviews after six months. Contacts between social workers and primary care were tracked. The findings suggest that co-location does not necessarily lead to substantially closer interprofessional working in terms of greater contact between social workers and GPs or social workers and community nurses. Factors affecting outcome were degree of cognitive impairment, intensity of home care received and whether the older person lived alone. Whatever the model of collaborative working, its effects on remaining in the community must be assessed in the wider context of the characteristics and services received by older people.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15842078     DOI: 10.1080/1356182040021734

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interprof Care        ISSN: 1356-1820            Impact factor:   2.338


  6 in total

1.  Integrated team working: a literature review.

Authors:  Sian E Maslin-Prothero; Amy E Bennion
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 5.120

2.  Integrated mental health services in England: a policy paradox.

Authors:  Elizabeth England; Helen Lester
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.120

3.  Is the co-location of GPs in primary care centres associated with a higher patient satisfaction? Evidence from a population survey in Italy.

Authors:  Manila Bonciani; Sara Barsanti; Anna Maria Murante
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  Co-location as a Driver for Cross-Sectoral Collaboration with General Practitioners as Coordinators: The Case of a Danish Municipal Health Centre.

Authors:  Christian Elling Scheele; Karsten Vrangbæk
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 5.120

5.  Defining Pooled' Place-Based' Budgets for Health and Social Care: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Davide Tebaldi; Jonathan Stokes
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 2.913

6.  Clustering and inertia: structural integration of home care in Swedish elderly care.

Authors:  Nils Olof Hedman; Roine Johansson; Urban Rosenqvist
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2007-09-12       Impact factor: 5.120

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.