Literature DB >> 15842017

Inference generation during text comprehension by adults with right hemisphere brain damage: activation failure versus multiple activation.

Connie A Tompkins1, Wiltrud Fassbinder, Margaret Lehman Blake, Annette Baumgaertner, Nandini Jayaram.   

Abstract

Evidence conflicts as to whether adults with right hemisphere brain damage (RHD) generate inferences during text comprehension. M. Beeman (1993) reported that adults with RHD fail to activate the lexical-semantic bases of routine bridging inferences, which are necessary for comprehension. But other evidence indicates that adults with RHD activate multiple interpretations in various comprehension domains. In addition, the activation of contextually inappropriate interpretations is prolonged for many adults with RHD and predicts poor discourse comprehension. This study contrasted Beeman's activation failure hypothesis with the prediction that adults with RHD would generate multiple interpretations in text comprehension. The relation between activation of textually incompatible inferences and discourse comprehension was also investigated for this group. Thirty-seven adults with RHD and 34 without brain damage listened to brief narratives that required a bridging inference (BI) to integrate the text-final sentence. This final sentence, when isolated from its text, was strongly biased toward a contextually incompatible alternate interpretation (AI). Auditory phoneme strings were presented for lexical decision immediately after each text's initial and final sentence. Adults with RHD were both faster and more accurate in making lexical decisions to BI-related target words in final-sentence position than in initial-sentence position. Thus, contrary to the activation failure hypothesis, adults with RHD generated the lexical-semantic foundations of BIs where they were required by the text. AI generation was evident in accuracy data as well, but not in response time data. This result is partially consistent with the multiple activation view. Finally, greater activation for contextually incompatible interpretations was associated with poorer discourse comprehension performance by adults with RHD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15842017     DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2004/103)

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  14 in total

1.  Theoretical Considerations for Understanding "Understanding" by Adults With Right Hemisphere Brain Damage.

Authors:  Connie A Tompkins
Journal:  Perspect Neurophysiol Neurogenic Speech Lang Disord       Date:  2008-06-01

2.  Individual differences in the neural basis of causal inferencing.

Authors:  Chantel S Prat; Robert A Mason; Marcel Adam Just
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 2.381

3.  Voxel-Based Lesion Symptom Mapping of Coarse Coding and Suppression Deficits in Patients With Right Hemisphere Damage.

Authors:  Ying Yang; Connie A Tompkins; Kimberly M Meigh; Chantel S Prat
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.408

4.  Differentiable cortical networks for inferences concerning people's intentions versus physical causality.

Authors:  Robert A Mason; Marcel Adam Just
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Contextual Constraint Treatment for coarse coding deficit in adults with right hemisphere brain damage: generalisation to narrative discourse comprehension.

Authors:  Margaret Lehman Blake; Connie A Tompkins; Victoria L Scharp; Kimberly M Meigh; Julie Wambaugh
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rehabil       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 2.868

6.  Discourse Impairments Following Right Hemisphere Brain Damage: A Critical Review.

Authors:  Clinton L Johns; Kristen M Tooley; Matthew J Traxler
Journal:  Lang Linguist Compass       Date:  2008-11

7.  Activation and maintenance of peripheral semantic features of unambiguous words after right hemisphere brain damage in adults.

Authors:  Connie A Tompkins; Wiltrud Fassbinder; Victoria L Scharp; Kimberly M Meigh
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 2.773

8.  Generalization of a Novel, Implicit Treatment for Coarse Coding Deficit in Right Hemisphere Brain Damage: A Single Subject Experiment.

Authors:  Connie A Tompkins; Victoria L Scharp; Kimberly Meigh; Margaret Lehman Blake; Julie Wambaugh
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 2.773

9.  Hemispheric asymmetries in the perceptual representations of words.

Authors:  Amy E Lincoln; Debra L Long; Diane Swick; Jary Larsen; Kathleen Baynes
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  Hemispheric differences in the organization of memory for text ideas.

Authors:  Debra L Long; Clinton L Johns; Eunike Jonathan
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 2.381

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.