BACKGROUND: Dissociation, defined as a disruption in usually integrated mental functions, is found not only in DSM-IV dissociative disorders, but also in post-traumatic stress disorder and eating disorders. Dissociative phenomena are also common in the general population, and may reflect a constitutionally determined cognitive style rather than a pathological trait acquired through experiencing adverse life events. In pathological dissociation, evidence has been presented for episodic memory dysfunction. In contrast, in high-dissociative subjects increased performance has been found for episodic memory and dual task performance. These findings have been linked to changes in working memory capacity. METHOD: In the present study, the authors sought to extend these findings by using functional magnetic resonance imaging during performance of two parametric working memory tasks. We tested 21 healthy low- and high-dissociative participants. RESULTS: High-dissociative participants performed slightly better during both tasks. Imaging data showed that both groups activated similar networks for both tasks, i.e. (bilateral) dorsolateral (DL) and ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (PFC), parietal cortex, and supplementary motor area. Group x task interactions were found in the high-dissociative group in L DLPFC and L parietal cortex; in the low-dissociative group in R fusiform gyrus. The differences in the high-dissociative group were independent from performance differences, implying that high-dissociative subjects generally recruit this network to a greater extent. CONCLUSIONS: These results confirm earlier findings using a verbal WM task in high-dissociative participants, and are compatible with the conceptualization of non-pathological dissociation as an information-processing style, characterized by distinct attentional and mnemonic abilities.
BACKGROUND: Dissociation, defined as a disruption in usually integrated mental functions, is found not only in DSM-IV dissociative disorders, but also in post-traumatic stress disorder and eating disorders. Dissociative phenomena are also common in the general population, and may reflect a constitutionally determined cognitive style rather than a pathological trait acquired through experiencing adverse life events. In pathological dissociation, evidence has been presented for episodic memory dysfunction. In contrast, in high-dissociative subjects increased performance has been found for episodic memory and dual task performance. These findings have been linked to changes in working memory capacity. METHOD: In the present study, the authors sought to extend these findings by using functional magnetic resonance imaging during performance of two parametric working memory tasks. We tested 21 healthy low- and high-dissociative participants. RESULTS: High-dissociative participants performed slightly better during both tasks. Imaging data showed that both groups activated similar networks for both tasks, i.e. (bilateral) dorsolateral (DL) and ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (PFC), parietal cortex, and supplementary motor area. Group x task interactions were found in the high-dissociative group in L DLPFC and L parietal cortex; in the low-dissociative group in R fusiform gyrus. The differences in the high-dissociative group were independent from performance differences, implying that high-dissociative subjects generally recruit this network to a greater extent. CONCLUSIONS: These results confirm earlier findings using a verbal WM task in high-dissociative participants, and are compatible with the conceptualization of non-pathological dissociation as an information-processing style, characterized by distinct attentional and mnemonic abilities.
Authors: Harald Hampel; Nicola Toschi; Claudio Babiloni; Filippo Baldacci; Keith L Black; Arun L W Bokde; René S Bun; Francesco Cacciola; Enrica Cavedo; Patrizia A Chiesa; Olivier Colliot; Cristina-Maria Coman; Bruno Dubois; Andrea Duggento; Stanley Durrleman; Maria-Teresa Ferretti; Nathalie George; Remy Genthon; Marie-Odile Habert; Karl Herholz; Yosef Koronyo; Maya Koronyo-Hamaoui; Foudil Lamari; Todd Langevin; Stéphane Lehéricy; Jean Lorenceau; Christian Neri; Robert Nisticò; Francis Nyasse-Messene; Craig Ritchie; Simone Rossi; Emiliano Santarnecchi; Olaf Sporns; Steven R Verdooner; Andrea Vergallo; Nicolas Villain; Erfan Younesi; Francesco Garaci; Simone Lista Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2018 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: C Rottschy; S Caspers; C Roski; K Reetz; I Dogan; J B Schulz; K Zilles; A R Laird; P T Fox; S B Eickhoff Journal: Brain Struct Funct Date: 2012-11-10 Impact factor: 3.270
Authors: Lora Dimitrova; Vinuri Fernando; Eline M Vissia; Ellert R S Nijenhuis; Nel Draijer; Antje A T S Reinders Journal: Eur J Psychotraumatol Date: 2020-01-13