AIM: To determine the value of cord blood cardiac troponin I levels (cTnl) as an early prognostic factor in critically ill newborns, and to compare cord cTnl levels with the prognostic value of the score for neonatal acute physiology (SNAP). METHODS: Cord arterial samples were collected routinely for blood gas analysis, and cord venous samples for cTnl and cardiac-specific creatine kinase assay. The study group (n=109) comprised critically ill newborns who required mechanical ventilation. The control group (n = 96) comprised newborns who were either completely healthy (n = 48) or were followed in a level I neonatal care unit due to moderate-severity problems. RESULTS: The critically ill newborns had significantly higher cTnl levels than control babies (median [min-max] 1.4 [0-13] vs. 0 [0-1.8] ng/mL, respectively; P<0.001). In critically ill newborns, non-survivors had significantly higher cTnl levels than survivors (median [min-max] 6.6 [1.3-13.0] vs. 1.3 [0-8.0] ng/mL, respectively; P<0.001). Receiver-operator curve analysis revealed that, compared with SNAP, cTnl was a more sensitive predictor of mortality in critically ill newborns (area under curve=0.96; 95% CI=0.90-1.02). CONCLUSION: Significantly elevated cord cTnl may be a valuable predictor of mortality in critically ill newborns.
AIM: To determine the value of cord blood cardiac troponin I levels (cTnl) as an early prognostic factor in critically ill newborns, and to compare cord cTnl levels with the prognostic value of the score for neonatal acute physiology (SNAP). METHODS: Cord arterial samples were collected routinely for blood gas analysis, and cord venous samples for cTnl and cardiac-specific creatine kinase assay. The study group (n=109) comprised critically ill newborns who required mechanical ventilation. The control group (n = 96) comprised newborns who were either completely healthy (n = 48) or were followed in a level I neonatal care unit due to moderate-severity problems. RESULTS: The critically ill newborns had significantly higher cTnl levels than control babies (median [min-max] 1.4 [0-13] vs. 0 [0-1.8] ng/mL, respectively; P<0.001). In critically ill newborns, non-survivors had significantly higher cTnl levels than survivors (median [min-max] 6.6 [1.3-13.0] vs. 1.3 [0-8.0] ng/mL, respectively; P<0.001). Receiver-operator curve analysis revealed that, compared with SNAP, cTnl was a more sensitive predictor of mortality in critically ill newborns (area under curve=0.96; 95% CI=0.90-1.02). CONCLUSION: Significantly elevated cord cTnl may be a valuable predictor of mortality in critically ill newborns.
Authors: Steven E Lipshultz; Valeriano C Simbre; Sema Hart; Nader Rifai; Stuart R Lipsitz; Linda Reubens; Robert A Sinkin Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2008-07-09 Impact factor: 2.778