Literature DB >> 15841588

The effects of social support on health, well-being and management of diabetes mellitus: a black South African perspective.

Margaret S Westaway1, John R Seager, Paul Rheeder, Danie G Van Zyl.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the underlying dimensions of a social support measure and investigate the effects of social support on health, well-being and management of diabetes mellitus (metabolic control and blood pressure (BP) control).
DESIGN: A cross-sectional, analytical design was used with a structured questionnaire, comprising demographic characteristics, the MOS Social Support Survey scale and the health perceptions and mental health sub-scales from the SF-20.
SETTING: Two outpatient diabetes mellitus clinics in Pretoria, South Africa. PARTICIPANTS: Over a three-month period, the questionnaire was administered to 263 black diabetes mellitus outpatients (174 women and 89 men), aged between 16 and 89 years. The majority of patients (91%) were diagnosed as type 2 diabetes mellitus. Only 22% of the patients had acceptable metabolic control (HbA1c < 8.0%), in comparison with 46% who had good BP control (130/85 mmHg). There were significant differences between the clinics on BP control: participants from clinic 1 had better BP control than participants from clinic 2.
RESULTS: Principal components analysis, followed by an orthogonal (VARIMAX) rotational solution, resulted in two social support factors accounting for 78.9% of the variance. The first factor was labelled socio-emotional support, due to the emphasis on close caring relationships. The second factor was concerned with the more tangible aspects of social support, such as the provision of assistance. Coefficient alpha was 0.97 (socio-emotional support), 0.95 (tangible support) and 0.97 (overall social support). Patients with lower levels of social support had poorer general health and well-being than patients with higher levels of social support. Controlling for clinic, patients with controlled BP had significantly more socio-emotional and tangible support than patients with poor BP control.
CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrated that: (1) socio-emotional and tangible support were the underlying dimensions of social support; (2) socio-emotional support is an important determinant of health and well-being; and (3) social support is beneficial for one aspect of diabetes mellitus management, namely, BP control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15841588     DOI: 10.1080/1355785052000323047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ethn Health        ISSN: 1355-7858            Impact factor:   2.772


  20 in total

1.  Religiosity, Social Support and Care Associated with Health in Older Mexicans with Diabetes.

Authors:  Maricruz Rivera-Hernandez
Journal:  J Relig Health       Date:  2016-08

2.  Factor analyses of a social support scale using two methods.

Authors:  Yu Yu; Cheng-Shi Shiu; Joyce P Yang; Mingjiong Wang; Jane M Simoni; Wei-ti Chen; Joy Cheng; Hongxin Zhao
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  The role of religious coping and social support on medication adherence and quality of life among the elderly with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Mohsen Saffari; Chung-Ying Lin; Hui Chen; Amir H Pakpour
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  The relationship between social support and anxiety among caregivers of children in HIV-endemic South Africa.

Authors:  Marisa Casale; Lauren Wild; Lucie Cluver; Caroline Kuo
Journal:  Psychol Health Med       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 2.423

5.  Subjective quality of life of outpatients with diabetes: comparison with family caregivers' impressions and control group.

Authors:  Abdel W Awadalla; Jude U Ohaeri; Adel M Tawfiq; Shafika A Al-Awadi
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.798

6.  Psychometric properties and factor structure of the Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey Instrument in a sample of Spanish older adults.

Authors:  Cristina G Dumitrache; Laura Rubio; José Luis Cabezas Casado; Eulogio Cordón-Pozo
Journal:  Eur J Ageing       Date:  2021-03-26

7.  Validation of the MOS Social Support Survey 6-item (MOS-SSS-6) measure with two large population-based samples of Australian women.

Authors:  Libby Holden; Christina Lee; Richard Hockey; Robert S Ware; Annette J Dobson
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 8.  Quality of life in glaucoma and three other chronic diseases: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Tim Mills; Simon K Law; John Walt; Patricia Buchholz; Jan Hansen
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.923

9.  Social support as a protective factor for depression among women caring for children in HIV-endemic South Africa.

Authors:  Marisa Casale; Lauren Wild; Lucie Cluver; Caroline Kuo
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2014-02-09

10.  Psychometric testing of the Chinese version of the Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey among people living with HIV/AIDS in China.

Authors:  Yu Yu; Joyce P Yang; Cheng-Shi Shiu; Jane M Simoni; Shuiyuan Xiao; Wei-Ti Chen; Deepa Rao; Mingjiong Wang
Journal:  Appl Nurs Res       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 2.257

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.