Literature DB >> 15841379

Evaluation of steady state free precession imaging of the pancreas.

Christoph U Herborn1, Florian M Vogt, Thomas C Lauenstein, Mathias Goyen, Jörg F Debatin, Stefan G Ruehm.   

Abstract

The aim of this work was to assess the diagnostic value of fast steady state free precession (SSFP) for the detection, characterization, and delineation of pancreatic lesions. Forty-eight patients referred for magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the pancreas were included in the study. In addition to the standard protocol, axial pre-contrast SSFP slices of the pancreas were acquired. The standard of reference was defined as based on all imaging data other than SSFP, histopathology, surgery, and/or clinical follow-up. A randomized consensus reading of the SSFP data sets was retrospectively conducted by two board-certified radiologists. The presence of pancreatic lesions, local infiltration, and lymph node metastases was evaluated. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated and a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed. The overall sensitivity and specificity of SSFP were 0.93 and 0.77, respectively. Comparable values were achieved for lymph node detection (0.88/0.91) and assessment of vascular infiltration (0.94/0.91). The mean area under the ROC curve (Az) was 0.91. Owing to its potential to detect vascular infiltration and the rapid acquisition time, SSFP imaging should be supplemented as part of a standard MR protocol of the pancreas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15841379     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-005-2774-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  18 in total

Review 1.  Principles and applications of balanced SSFP techniques.

Authors:  Klaus Scheffler; Stefan Lehnhardt
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-08-20       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  TrueFISP--technical considerations and cardiovascular applications.

Authors:  Friedrich Fuchs; Gerhard Laub; Kuni Othomo
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.528

3.  Is postcontrast trueFISP imaging advantageous?

Authors:  Bettina Jung; Gabriele A Krombach; Rolf W Günther; Arno Buecker
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 6.016

4.  Liver lesion conspicuity: T2-weighted breath-hold fast spin-echo MR imaging before and after gadolinium enhancement--initial experience.

Authors:  Y Y Jeong; D G Mitchell; G A Holland
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 5.  Imaging of cystic diseases of the pancreas.

Authors:  Nancy Hammond; Frank H Miller; Gregory T Sica; Richard M Gore
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.303

6.  Evaluation of a 10-minute comprehensive MR imaging examination of the upper abdomen.

Authors:  R C Semelka; N C Balci; B Op de Beeck; C Reinhold
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Pancreatic carcinoma and fast MR imaging: technical considerations for signal intensity difference measurements.

Authors:  A Piironen; R Kivisaari; P Laippala; V P Poutanen; L Kivisaari
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.528

8.  Preoperative local MRI-staging of patients with a suspected pancreatic mass.

Authors:  U Fischer; R Vosshenrich; O Horstmann; H Becker; B Salamat; F Baum; E Grabbe
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2001-10-30       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Pancreatic masses with inconclusive findings on spiral CT: is there a role for MRI?

Authors:  R C Semelka; N L Kelekis; P L Molina; T J Sharp; B Calvo
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1996 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  Small pancreatic adenocarcinomas: efficacy of MR imaging with fat suppression and gadolinium enhancement.

Authors:  T Gabata; O Matsui; M Kadoya; J Yoshikawa; S Miyayama; T Takashima; T Nagakawa; M Kayahara; A Nonomura
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 11.105

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.