Literature DB >> 15841314

Bleeding and re-thrombosis in primary antiphospholipid syndrome on oral anticoagulation: an 8-year longitudinal comparison with mitral valve replacement and inherited thrombophilia.

Paul R J Ames1, Antonio Ciampa, Maurizio Margaglione, Giovanna Scenna, Luigi Iannaccone, Vincenzo Brancaccio.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare bleeding and re-thrombosis in primary antiphospholipid syndrome (PAPS), mitral valve replacement (MVR) and inherited thrombophilia (IT) at different oral anticoagulation intensities. It entailed a prospective 8-year follow-up on 67 patients with PAPS, 89 with IT and 24 with MVR. Anticardiolipin (aCL) antibodies detected by Elisa and lupus anticoagulant by clotting assays. At INR 2-3 minor bleeding rate was higher in MVR (33.3) than PAPS (10.9) and IT (4.2)(p<0.0001). At INR 3-4 minor bleeding rate was higher in PAPS (142) than IT (33.3) and MVR (5.8)(p<0.0001). At either INR major bleeding rate were not significantly different across the three groups, but in PAPS major and minor bleeding rates were superior at INR 3-4 than INR 2-3 (p=0.02 and p<0.0001). Re-thrombosis rate was higher in PAPS than IT at INR 2-3 (4.0 vs 0.35) (p=0.01) and at INR 3-4 (10.5 vs. nil). The hazard ratio for re-thrombosis between PAPS and IT was 13 (95% IC 1.6-102.2, p=0.015). By regression analysis, baseline IgG aCL titre (>80 GPL) p=0.001) and male sex (p=0.03) independently predicted re-thrombosis. In conclusion, in PAPS, high intensity oral anticoagulation was not superior to conventional intensity in preventing re-thrombosis but was offset by greater bleeding rates. Male sex and elevated baseline IgG aCL predicted rethrombosis in PAPS that is 13-fold more re-thrombogenic than IT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15841314     DOI: 10.1160/TH04-11-0723

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thromb Haemost        ISSN: 0340-6245            Impact factor:   5.249


  6 in total

Review 1.  Antiphospholipid syndrome: frequency, main causes and risk factors of mortality.

Authors:  Gerard Espinosa; Ricard Cervera
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2010-04-13       Impact factor: 20.543

Review 2.  Frequency of adverse events in patients with poor anticoagulation: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Natalie Oake; Dean A Fergusson; Alan J Forster; Carl van Walraven
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 3.  Treatment of Thrombotic Antiphospholipid Syndrome: The Rationale of Current Management-An Insight into Future Approaches.

Authors:  Cecilia Beatrice Chighizola; Tania Ubiali; Pier Luigi Meroni
Journal:  J Immunol Res       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 4.818

Review 4.  Management of the antiphospholipid syndrome.

Authors:  Gerard Espinosa; Ricard Cervera
Journal:  Auto Immun Highlights       Date:  2010-07-10

Review 5.  Recommended Therapeutic INR Range for Patients with Antiphospholipid Syndrome on Warfarin Anticoagulation: Is Moderate-Intensity (INR 2.0 - 3.0) or High-Intensity (INR 3.1 - 4.0) Better for Reducing Risk of Recurrent Thromboembolic Events?

Authors:  Esther Kim; Tiffanie Do; Katie Peacock; Prisca T Takundwa
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2016-09-01

Review 6.  Management of thrombotic and obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome: a systematic literature review informing the EULAR recommendations for the management of antiphospholipid syndrome in adults.

Authors:  Maria G Tektonidou; Laura Andreoli; Marteen Limper; Angela Tincani; Michael M Ward
Journal:  RMD Open       Date:  2019-04-28
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.