Literature DB >> 15840796

Ultrasonographic detection of occult cancer in patients after surgical therapy for breast cancer.

Jung Hee Shin1, Boo-Kyung Han, Yeon Hyeon Choe, Seok-Jin Nam, Won Park, Young-Hyuck Im.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy of ultrasonography in detecting an occult malignancy after surgery for breast cancer and to assess the imaging and clinical findings associated with a recurrence.
METHODS: During a 4-year period, 3329 bilateral whole-breast ultrasonographic examinations were performed to detect occult malignancies clinically and mammographically in 1968 asymptomatic patients after breast cancer surgery. All questionable lesions were confirmed with ultrasonographically guided intervention. This study reviewed ultrasonographic findings and pathologic results of the questionable lesions along with the clinical parameters of the patients. We searched for false-negative cases from the hospital database.
RESULTS: Among the 1968 patients, ultrasonography revealed questionable lesions in 57 (2.9%). The questionable lesions were lymph nodes in 42 and masses in 15; of these lesions, 24 were malignant (true-positive) and 33 were benign (false-positive). Ten false-negative cases were identified. The sensitivity and specificity were 70.6% and 98.3%, respectively. The locations of the recurrent lesions were the regional lymph nodes in 14 cases (4, axillary fossa; 4, interpectoral; 4, internal mammary; and 2, supraclavicular lymph nodes) and the breast and mastectomy bed in 7 cases. The mean size of the malignant lymph nodes was larger than that of the benign lymph nodes. Among those with positive examination results, the clinical parameters in the recurrent and nonrecurrent groups were similar.
CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative follow-up ultrasonography showed occult malignancies clinically and mammographically in 1.2% of the patients who had been treated for breast cancer. Familiarity with the common location of a tumor recurrence is essential for making an accurate ultrasonographic evaluation in these patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15840796     DOI: 10.7863/jum.2005.24.5.643

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ultrasound Med        ISSN: 0278-4297            Impact factor:   2.153


  5 in total

1.  Imaging studies for the early detection of breast cancer.

Authors:  Sylvia H Heywang-Köbrunner; Ingrid Schreer; Walter Heindel; Alexander Katalinic
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2008-08-04       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  FDG-PET and other imaging modalities for the evaluation of breast cancer recurrence and metastases: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  LingLing Pan; Yuan Han; XiaoGuang Sun; JianJun Liu; Huang Gang
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-01-21       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 3.  Surveillance mammography for detecting ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence and metachronous contralateral breast cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Clare Robertson; Senthil Kumar Arcot Ragupathy; Charles Boachie; Cynthia Fraser; Steve D Heys; Graeme Maclennan; Graham Mowatt; Ruth E Thomas; Fiona J Gilbert
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Imaging surveillance of patients with breast cancer after primary treatment: current recommendations.

Authors:  Jung Hyun Yoon; Min Jung Kim; Eun-Kyung Kim; Hee Jung Moon
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 3.500

5.  Breast ultrasound in breast cancer surveillance; incremental cancers found at what cost?

Authors:  Luke Bromley; Jennifer Xu; Su-Wen Loh; Grace Chew; Eddie Lau; Belinda Yeo
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 4.380

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.