Literature DB >> 15840054

Minimal and optimal peritoneal Kt/V targets: results of an anuric peritoneal dialysis patient's survival analysis.

Wai-Kei Lo1, Sing-Leung Lui, Tak-Mao Chan, Fu-Keung Li, Man-Fai Lam, Kai-Chung Tse, Sydney Chi-Wai Tang, Cindy Bo-Ying Choy, Kar-Neng Lai.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Residual renal clearance has been shown to be much more predictive of survival than peritoneal clearance. There has been little data to support a target level of peritoneal clearance. A retrospective study was therefore conducted to see how the peritoneal Kt/V had affected the survival of anuric patients in our center.
METHODS: Over a period of 10 years, there were 150 peritoneal dialysis patients with documented anuria. Their survival was analyzed according to their baseline peritoneal Kt/V at the time of documentation of anuria and at the time of their latest altered peritoneal dialysis (PD) prescription (subsequent Kt/V).
RESULTS: There were 90 females and 42 diabetics. The mean age and duration of dialysis were 57.7 +/- 14.7 and 44.1 +/- 31.3 months, respectively. The 2-year and 5-year survival rates were 88.7% and 66.7%, respectively. We found that patients with baseline peritoneal Kt/V below 1.67 had poorer survival after the documentation of anuria than those above [relative risk (RR) 1.985, P= 0.01], although the baseline Kt/V was not an independent risk factors in the whole group of patients. However, such effect was mainly observed in female patients. The survival was identical between those with Kt/V above or below 1.80 (P= 0.98). Among female patients, the group with baseline Kt/V 1.67 to 1.86 had the best survival, followed by those greater than 1.86 and lowest in those below 1.67 (P= 0.0016). For patients with baseline Kt/V below 1.80, those with subsequent Kt/V above 1.76 had better survival than those below (P= 0.033).
CONCLUSION: Our data suggested that a negative effect of peritoneal Kt/V on survival is apparent at a level below 1.67 and there exists a limit of its effect at around 1.80. We suggested a minimal Kt/V target of 1.70 and an optimal target at 1.80 in anuric patients based on survival data. Prospective randomized study is required to confirm this finding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15840054     DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.00305.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Kidney Int        ISSN: 0085-2538            Impact factor:   10.612


  10 in total

Review 1.  Peritoneal Dialysis Adequacy in Elderly Patients.

Authors:  Elizabeth Oei; Stanley Fan
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.756

Review 2.  Long-term outcome of chronic dialysis in children.

Authors:  Rukshana Shroff; Sarah Ledermann
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2008-01-23       Impact factor: 3.714

3.  Influence of Different Payment Schemes on the Clinical Outcome in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients.

Authors:  Chun-yan Su; Xin-hong Lu; Tao Wang
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 1.756

4.  Association of Alternative Approaches to Normalizing Peritoneal Dialysis Clearance with Mortality and Technique Failure: A Retrospective Analysis Using the United States Renal Data System-Dialysis Morbidity and Mortality Study, Wave 2.

Authors:  Suzanne M Boyle; Yimei Li; F Perry Wilson; Joel D Glickman; Harold I Feldman
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 1.756

5.  Hemoglobin level and risk of hospitalization and mortality in children on peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  Erin K Dahlinghaus; Alicia M Neu; Meredith A Atkinson; Jeffrey J Fadrowski
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2014-08-10       Impact factor: 3.714

6.  Dialysis adequacy in Chinese anuric peritoneal dialysis patients.

Authors:  Yeqing Shao; Sha Ma; Xiangyin Tian; Tao Wang; Jiayun Xu
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 2.370

7.  Safety issues of long-term glucose load in patients on peritoneal dialysis--a 7-year cohort study.

Authors:  Hon-Yen Wu; Kuan-Yu Hung; Tao-Min Huang; Fu-Chang Hu; Yu-Sen Peng; Jenq-Wen Huang; Shuei-Liong Lin; Yung-Ming Chen; Tzong-Shinn Chu; Tun-Jun Tsai; Kwan-Dun Wu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-23       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Monitoring dialysis adequacy: history and current practice.

Authors:  Linda Ding; James Johnston; Maury N Pinsk
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 3.714

Review 9.  Peritoneal dialysis: the ideal bridge from conservative therapy to kidney transplant.

Authors:  Sydney C W Tang; Kar Neng Lai
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2020-07-11       Impact factor: 3.902

Review 10.  Choice of dialysis modality prior to kidney transplantation: Does it matter?

Authors:  Deepika Jain; Danny B Haddad; Narender Goel
Journal:  World J Nephrol       Date:  2019-01-21
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.