Literature DB >> 15839868

Impact of patient and professional diagnostic delays on the risk of recurrence in laryngeal carcinoma.

H Teppo1, K Hyrynkangas, P Koivunen, K Jokinen, O-P Alho.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of patient and professional diagnostic delays on the risk of recurrence in laryngeal squamocellular carcinoma (LSCC).
DESIGN: Retrospective study using primary health care records completed before the diagnosis of malignancy.
SETTING: One primary health care district (onset of symptoms), one tertiary centre (final diagnosis). PARTICIPANTS: A population-based sample of 99 patients, of which 66 fulfilled the entry criteria, with LSCC diagnosed in northern Finland in 1990-1995. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Impact of patient delay (interval between the onset of symptoms and the first visit to a physician) and professional delay (interval between the first medical visit and histologically verified diagnosis) on the risk of local, neck and distant recurrence in LSCC.
RESULTS: Professional delay of 1 year or longer was an independent predictor of both local [adjusted relative hazard (HR) 4.62, P = 0.02] and neck (HR 9.5, P = 0.015) recurrence. Longer professional delay was associated with the risk of recurrence particularly among patients with early stage (stages I-II) disease. Professional delay was almost exclusively because of a delay in referring patients from primary care to an ENT centre.
CONCLUSIONS: Lengthened professional diagnostic delay is an independent predictor of an increased risk of local and neck recurrence in early stage LSCC. These patients could benefit from more aggressive primary treatment or more meticulous follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15839868     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2273.2004.00954.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1749-4478            Impact factor:   2.597


  5 in total

1.  Hoarseness of unclear origin in adults.

Authors:  Angus P Morgan; Matthew H Rigby
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Cancer diagnostic tools to aid decision-making in primary care: mixed-methods systematic reviews and cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Antonieta Medina-Lara; Bogdan Grigore; Ruth Lewis; Jaime Peters; Sarah Price; Paolo Landa; Sophie Robinson; Richard Neal; William Hamilton; Anne E Spencer
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 4.014

Review 3.  Is increased time to diagnosis and treatment in symptomatic cancer associated with poorer outcomes? Systematic review.

Authors:  R D Neal; P Tharmanathan; B France; N U Din; S Cotton; J Fallon-Ferguson; W Hamilton; A Hendry; M Hendry; R Lewis; U Macleod; E D Mitchell; M Pickett; T Rai; K Shaw; N Stuart; M L Tørring; C Wilkinson; B Williams; N Williams; J Emery
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 4.  Prognostic factors in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Carol R Bradford; Alfio Ferlito; Kenneth O Devaney; Antti A Mäkitie; Alessandra Rinaldo
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-01-27

5.  Percutaneous Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology and Core-Needle Biopsy for Laryngeal and Hypopharyngeal Masses.

Authors:  Dongbin Ahn; Gil Joon Lee; Jin Ho Sohn; Jeong Eun Lee
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 3.500

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.