Literature DB >> 15839113

Bone regeneration after peri-implant care with the CO2 laser: a fluorescence microscopy study.

Stefan Stübinger1, Julia Henke, Karl Donath, Herbert Deppe.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The carbon dioxide (CO2) laser has been shown to be suitable for the treatment of ailing implants. However, comparatively little is known about bone regeneration after laser treatment. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine the course of bone regeneration after peri-implant care with the CO2 laser.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 6 beagle dogs, a total of 60 implants and bony defects were treated either conventionally by air-powder abrasive (group 1), by laser irradiation alone (group 2), or by a combination of the 2 (group 3). After therapy, polychrome sequence labeling was performed using 4 different markers. Four months later, after sacrifice, histologic sections were photographed and scanned. In each specimen, the 4 stained areas were detected with special software and indicated as a percentage of the standardized measurement frame. Lastly, the time-course of the bone regeneration was determined for each of the 3 therapy groups.
RESULTS: Fluorescence microscopy demonstrated maximum bone regeneration after 8 weeks in all 3 therapy groups. In this period, groups 2 and 3 showed significantly greater amounts of newly formed bone than group 1 (P < .03 and P < .05, respectively). However, there was no difference in bone regeneration between groups 2 and 3. DISCUSSION: Using fluoresence microscopy, it was possible to analyze and interpret the bone regeneration processes during all 4 application phases of the 3 groups.
CONCLUSIONS: These results support the hypothesis that CO2 laser irradiation renders significantly more new bone formation, especially 5 to 8 weeks postoperatively, than conventional decontamination in the dog model. Further investigation will be required to determine the clinical efficacy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15839113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants        ISSN: 0882-2786            Impact factor:   2.804


  7 in total

1.  Er:YAG laser therapy for peri-implant infection: a histological study.

Authors:  Aristeo Atsushi Takasaki; Akira Aoki; Koji Mizutani; Shigenari Kikuchi; Shigeru Oda; Isao Ishikawa
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2007-01-12       Impact factor: 3.161

Review 2.  Laser wavelengths and oral implantology.

Authors:  George E Romanos; Norbert Gutknecht; Sandra Dieter; Frank Schwarz; Roberto Crespi; Anton Sculean
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2009-05-09       Impact factor: 3.161

3.  Re-stability of dental implants following treatment of peri-implantitis.

Authors:  Fawad Javed; Hamza Ather Hussain; Georgios E Romanos
Journal:  Interv Med Appl Sci       Date:  2013-09-16

4.  Thermodynamic effects of laser irradiation of implants placed in bone: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Chris Leja; Alessandro Geminiani; Jack Caton; Georgios E Romanos
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 3.161

5.  Evaluation of surface changes of dental implants after irradiation with diode laser beams with different energies: A SEM study.

Authors:  Masoumeh Faramarzi; Mehrnoosh Sadighi; Sayeh Mirhashemi
Journal:  J Adv Periodontol Implant Dent       Date:  2018-12-25

6.  Decontamination of dental implant surfaces by means of photodynamic therapy.

Authors:  Juliana Marotti; Pedro Tortamano; Silvana Cai; Martha Simões Ribeiro; João Eduardo Miranda Franco; Tomie Toyota de Campos
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 3.161

Review 7.  The role of lasers in the treatment of peri-implant diseases: A review.

Authors:  Fahad Ali Alshehri
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2016-07-08
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.