Literature DB >> 15838862

Metric dental variation of major human populations.

Tsunehiko Hanihara1, Hajime Ishida.   

Abstract

Mesiodistal and buccolingual crown diameters of all teeth recorded in 72 major human population groups and seven geographic groups were analyzed. The results obtained are fivefold. First, the largest teeth are found among Australians, followed by Melanesians, Micronesians, sub-Saharan Africans, and Native Americans. Philippine Negritos, Jomon/Ainu, and Western Eurasians have small teeth, while East/Southeast Asians and Polynesians are intermediate in overall tooth size. Second, in terms of odontometric shape factors, world extremes are Europeans, aboriginal New World populations, and to a lesser extent, Australians. Third, East/Southeast Asians share similar dental features with sub-Saharan Africans, and fall in the center of the phenetic space occupied by a wide array of samples. Fourth, the patterning of dental variation among major geographic populations is more or less consistent with those obtained from genetic and craniometric data. Fifth, once differences in population size between sub-Saharan Africa, Europe, South/West Asia, Australia, and Far East, and genetic drift are taken into consideration, the pattern of sub-Saharan African distinctiveness becomes more or less comparable to that based on genetic and craniometric data. As such, worldwide patterning of odontometric variation provides an additional avenue in the ongoing investigation of the origin(s) of anatomically modern humans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15838862     DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.20080

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol        ISSN: 0002-9483            Impact factor:   2.868


  22 in total

1.  Comparison of mesiodistal tooth crown diameters and arch dimensions between modern Mongolians and Japanese.

Authors:  Yuh Hasegawa; Bazar Amarsaikhan; Netrporn Chinvipas; Shin-Ichi Tsukada; Kazuto Terada; Satoshi Uzuka; Wataru Miyashita; Satoshi Iguchi; Kazuhito Arai; Ikuo Kageyama; Sen Nakahara
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 2.634

2.  Ecological and evolutionary factors in dental morphological diversification among modern human populations from southern South America.

Authors:  Valeria Bernal; S Ivan Perez; Paula N Gonzalez; José Alexandre Felizola Diniz-Filho
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Shape covariation between the craniofacial complex and first molars in humans.

Authors:  Georgios Polychronis; Demetrios J Halazonetis
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 2.610

4.  Applicability of Cameriere's and Drusini's age estimation methods to a sample of Turkish adults.

Authors:  Boyacioglu Dogru Hatice; Avcu Nihal; Akkaya Nursel; Yilanci Humeyra Ozge; Dincer Goksuluk
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 2.419

5.  Growth hormone receptor gene is related to root length and tooth length in human teeth.

Authors:  Yu Hikita; Tetsutaro Yamaguchi; Daisuke Tomita; Mohamed Adel; Takatoshi Nakawaki; Koshu Katayama; Koutaro Maki; Ryosuke Kimura
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  A geographic cline of skull and brain morphology among individuals of European Ancestry.

Authors:  Trygve E Bakken; Anders M Dale; Nicholas J Schork
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 0.444

7.  Neutral evolution of human enamel-dentine junction morphology.

Authors:  Tesla A Monson; Diego Fecker; Marc Scherrer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-10-05       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  A common variation in EDAR is a genetic determinant of shovel-shaped incisors.

Authors:  Ryosuke Kimura; Tetsutaro Yamaguchi; Mayako Takeda; Osamu Kondo; Takashi Toma; Kuniaki Haneji; Tsunehiko Hanihara; Hirotaka Matsukusa; Shoji Kawamura; Koutaro Maki; Motoki Osawa; Hajime Ishida; Hiroki Oota
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  Isolated human crystalline lens three-dimensional shape: A comparison between Indian and European populations.

Authors:  Ashik Mohamed; Sushma Nandyala; Eduardo Martinez-Enriquez; Bianca Maceo Heilman; Robert C Augusteyn; Alberto de Castro; Marco Ruggeri; Jean-Marie A Parel; Susana Marcos; Fabrice Manns
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 3.467

10.  The effect of ancient population bottlenecks on human phenotypic variation.

Authors:  Andrea Manica; William Amos; François Balloux; Tsunehiko Hanihara
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-07-19       Impact factor: 49.962

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.