Literature DB >> 15838471

Carotid endarterectomy with a polyurethane patch versus primary closure: a prospective randomized study.

Dallit Mannheim1, Boaz Weller, Eran Vahadim, Ron Karmeli.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The use of synthetic patch angioplasty during carotid endarterectomy (CEA) has been advocated to reduce restenosis, stroke, and death, but the type of material used is still being debated. This study compared rate of restenosis, neurologic events, and perioperative death in patients undergoing CEA with primary closure versus polyester urethane patch closure. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a prospective randomized study, we compared patch angioplasty with polyester urethane (Vascular-patch, B. Braun Medical AG, Tuttlingen, Germany) to primary closure between February 1999 and March 2002 in 404 operations. Early (30-day) stroke and mortality rate, long-term restenosis, and neurologic events were compared in the two groups during 2.5 to 5 years of follow-up (median follow-up, 2 years).
RESULTS: Primary closure was used in 216 operations, and patch angioplasty was used in 206. Clamping time was significantly shorter in the primary closure group ( P < .001). Perioperative mortality and neurologic events were similar in both groups (1.9% vs 3.9%, P = .21, odds ratio [OR], 2.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.56 to 9.85). The rate of residual stenosis (> or =50%) at 0 or 3-month follow-up was significantly lower in the patch group (2 operations, 1.1%) compared with the primary closure group (17 operations, 8.9%) ( P = .001, OR, 0.114; 95% CI, 0.026 to 0.5). Multivariable logistic regression showed that only primacy closure was found to influence residual stenosis. Restenosis of 70% was significantly less in the patch angioplasty group (2.2% vs 8.6%) ( P = . 01, hazard ratio, 0.246; 95% CI, 0.08 to 0.75). No correlation was found between restenosis and gender, preoperative symptoms, or risk factors.
CONCLUSIONS: Patch angioplasty with polyester urethane significantly reduced the restenosis rate ( P = . 01) compared with primary closure. Even though clamping time was longer, patching was not associated with more perioperative complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15838471     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2004.11.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  12 in total

Review 1.  Management of extracranial carotid artery disease.

Authors:  Yinn Cher Ooi; Nestor R Gonzalez
Journal:  Cardiol Clin       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.213

Review 2.  Patch angioplasty versus primary closure for carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  Saritphat Orrapin; Thoetphum Benyakorn; Boonying Siribumrungwong; Kittipan Rerkasem
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-08-03

Review 3.  Carotid endarterectomy with patch angioplasty versus primary closure in patients with symptomatic and significant stenosis: a systematic review with meta-analyses and trial sequential analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Martijn S Marsman; Jørn Wetterslev; Abdelkarime Kh Jahrome; Christian Gluud; Frans L Moll; Frederik Keus; Giel G Koning
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2021-05-06

4.  Carotid endarterectomy in awake patients: safety, tolerability and results.

Authors:  Célio Teixeira Mendonça; Jerônimo A Fortunato; Cláudio A de Carvalho; Janaina Weingartner; Otávio R M Filho; Felipe F Rezende; Luciane P Bertinato
Journal:  Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc       Date:  2014 Oct-Dec

5.  Covalent modification of pericardial patches for sustained rapamycin delivery inhibits venous neointimal hyperplasia.

Authors:  Hualong Bai; Jung Seok Lee; Elizabeth Chen; Mo Wang; Ying Xing; Tarek M Fahmy; Alan Dardik
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Biomechanical Aspects of Closing Approaches in Postcarotid Endarterectomy.

Authors:  Idit Avrahami; Dafna Raz; Oranit Bash
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2018-10-28       Impact factor: 2.238

Review 7.  Systematic review of randomized controlled trials of different types of patch materials during carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  Shiyan Ren; Xianlun Li; Jianyan Wen; Wenjian Zhang; Peng Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Patch angioplasty versus primary closure for carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  Kittipan Rerkasem; Peter M Rothwell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-10-07

9.  Patch variability following carotid endarterectomy: a survey of Great Britain and Ireland.

Authors:  G J Harrison; J A Brennan; J B Naik; S R Vallabhaneni; R K Fisher
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 10.  Carotid artery stenting vs. carotid endarterectomy in the management of carotid artery stenosis: Lessons learned from randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Mohamed M Salem; Abdulrahman Y Alturki; Matthew R Fusco; Ajith J Thomas; Bob S Carter; Clark C Chen; Ekkehard M Kasper
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2018-04-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.