Literature DB >> 15838174

Physical function and quality of life after thoracoabdominal oesophageal resection. Results of a follow-up study.

Monika Fagevik Olsén1, Malin Larsson, Eva Hammerlid, Lars Lundell.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The long-term functional outcome after thoracoabdominal resection has to be better evaluated. A study was performed to evaluate patients after a similar operation both in terms of physical function and health-related quality of life (HRQL).
METHODS: Eighteen patients were evaluated 2 years after a thoracoabdominal resection. Respiratory function, physical performance and range of motion in shoulder, thorax and spine were recorded. HQRL was assessed by EORTC QLQ-C30 (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30) and EORTC QLQ-OES18 (Oeophageal module).
RESULTS: Two years after surgery, respiratory function (forced vital capacity and forced expiratory volume in 1 s) was significantly impaired compared to preoperative values (p < 0.05). The physical performance was significantly reduced as measured by a functional stand-up test (p < 0.05) and the handgrip force (p < 0.001). Shoulder range of motion, thoracic lateral flexion and C7 to wall were within normal ranges, thoracic flexion significantly greater (p < 0.01) but chest expansion significantly decreased (p < 0.01) compared to controls. HQRL was comparable to age- and sex-matched population norms for most of the functions. A clinical significant difference was, however, found for diarrhoea, dyspnoea, appetite loss and fatigue.
CONCLUSION: Within a 2-year period, each individual regains most of the respiratory and physical performances and HRQL after a thoracoabdominal resection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15838174     DOI: 10.1159/000085348

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Surg        ISSN: 0253-4886            Impact factor:   2.588


  8 in total

1.  Physical decline and its implications in the management of oesophageal and gastric cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Linda O'Neill; Jonathan Moran; Emer M Guinan; John V Reynolds; Juliette Hussey
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 4.442

Review 2.  Systematic review of health-related quality of life after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Marco Scarpa; Stefano Valente; Rita Alfieri; Matteo Cagol; Giorgio Diamantis; Ermanno Ancona; Carlo Castoro
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-11-14       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Quality of life after three kinds of esophagectomy for cancer.

Authors:  Jian Zeng; Jin-Shi Liu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Systematic review reveals limitations of studies evaluating health-related quality of life after potentially curative treatment for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Marc Jacobs; Rhiannon C Macefield; Jane M Blazeby; Ida J Korfage; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Hanneke C J M de Haes; Ellen M Smets; Mirjam A G Sprangers
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2012-10-20       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 5.  Physiotherapy Regimens in Esophagectomy and Gastrectomy: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Karina H Tukanova; Swathikan Chidambaram; Nadia Guidozzi; George B Hanna; Alison H McGregor; Sheraz R Markar
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-12-27       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Nurse-led follow-up of patients after oesophageal or gastric cardia cancer surgery: a randomised trial.

Authors:  E M L Verschuur; E W Steyerberg; H W Tilanus; S Polinder; M-L Essink-Bot; K T C Tran; A van der Gaast; L P S Stassen; E J Kuipers; P D Siersema
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2008-12-09       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 7.  Developing core outcomes sets: methods for identifying and including patient-reported outcomes (PROs).

Authors:  Rhiannon C Macefield; Marc Jacobs; Ida J Korfage; Joanna Nicklin; Robert N Whistance; Sara T Brookes; Mirjam A G Sprangers; Jane M Blazeby
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 8.  Assessment of chest wall movement following thoracotomy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Karina Tukanova; Enrica Papi; Sara Jamel; George B Hanna; Alison H McGregor; Sheraz R Markar
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 3.005

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.