OBJECTIVE: To estimate the association between UV index, latitude, and melanoma incidence in different racial and ethnic populations in a high-quality national data set. DESIGN: Descriptive study. SETTING: Eleven US cancer registries that constitute the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER-11). PATIENTS: Patients with malignant melanoma of the skin reported between 1992 and 2001. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pearson correlation coefficients and regression coefficients were used to estimate the relationship of age-adjusted melanoma incidence rates (2000 US standard population) with the UV index or latitude within racial and ethnic groups. RESULTS: A higher mean UV index was significantly associated with an increase in melanoma incidence only in non-Hispanic whites (r = 0.85, P = .001), although a nonsignificant association was noted in Native Americans (r = 0.42, P = .20). Negative, but not significant, correlations with incidence were observed in blacks (r = -0.53, P = .10), Hispanics (r = -0.43, P = .19), and Asians (r = -0.28, P = .41). Latitude also had a significant correlation with incidence only in non-Hispanic whites (r = -0.85, P = .001). A substantial portion of the variance in registry incidence in non-Hispanic whites could be explained by the UV index (R(2) = 0.71, P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: Melanoma incidence is associated with increased UV index and lower latitude only in non-Hispanic whites. No evidence to support the association of UV exposure and melanoma incidence in black or Hispanic populations was found.
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the association between UV index, latitude, and melanoma incidence in different racial and ethnic populations in a high-quality national data set. DESIGN: Descriptive study. SETTING: Eleven US cancer registries that constitute the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER-11). PATIENTS: Patients with malignant melanoma of the skin reported between 1992 and 2001. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pearson correlation coefficients and regression coefficients were used to estimate the relationship of age-adjusted melanoma incidence rates (2000 US standard population) with the UV index or latitude within racial and ethnic groups. RESULTS: A higher mean UV index was significantly associated with an increase in melanoma incidence only in non-Hispanic whites (r = 0.85, P = .001), although a nonsignificant association was noted in Native Americans (r = 0.42, P = .20). Negative, but not significant, correlations with incidence were observed in blacks (r = -0.53, P = .10), Hispanics (r = -0.43, P = .19), and Asians (r = -0.28, P = .41). Latitude also had a significant correlation with incidence only in non-Hispanic whites (r = -0.85, P = .001). A substantial portion of the variance in registry incidence in non-Hispanic whites could be explained by the UV index (R(2) = 0.71, P = .001). CONCLUSIONS:Melanoma incidence is associated with increased UV index and lower latitude only in non-Hispanic whites. No evidence to support the association of UV exposure and melanoma incidence in black or Hispanic populations was found.
Authors: Ricardo A Pollitt; Christina A Clarke; Susan M Swetter; David H Peng; John Zadnick; Myles Cockburn Journal: Cancer Date: 2010-08-24 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan; John L Maldonado; Vonetta L Williams; William T Curry; Elizabeth A Rodkey; Frederick G Barker; Andrew E Sloan Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2007-05-26 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Valentina A Andreeva; Jennifer B Unger; Amy L Yaroch; Myles G Cockburn; Lourdes Baezconde-Garbanati; Kim D Reynolds Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2009-01-15 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Thomas B Richards; Christopher J Johnson; Zaria Tatalovich; Myles Cockburn; Melody J Eide; Kevin A Henry; Sue-Min Lai; Sai S Cherala; Youjie Huang; Umed A Ajani Journal: J Am Acad Dermatol Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 11.527
Authors: Caitlin Mason; Liren Xiao; Ikuyo Imayama; Catherine R Duggan; Carolyn Bain; Karen E Foster-Schubert; Angela Kong; Kristin L Campbell; Ching-Yun Wang; Marian L Neuhouser; Li Li; Robert W Jeffery; Kim Robien; Catherine M Alfano; George L Blackburn; Anne McTiernan Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2011-05-25 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Robert R McWilliams; Eric D Wieben; Kari G Chaffee; Samuel O Antwi; Leon Raskin; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Donghui Li; W Edward Highsmith; Gerardo Colon-Otero; Lauren G Khanna; Jennifer B Permuth; Janet E Olson; Harold Frucht; Jeanine Genkinger; Wei Zheng; William J Blot; Lang Wu; Luciana L Almada; Martin E Fernandez-Zapico; Hugues Sicotte; Katrina S Pedersen; Gloria M Petersen Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2018-07-23 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Giuseppe Palmieri; Mariaelena Capone; Maria Libera Ascierto; Giusy Gentilcore; David F Stroncek; Milena Casula; Maria Cristina Sini; Marco Palla; Nicola Mozzillo; Paolo A Ascierto Journal: J Transl Med Date: 2009-10-14 Impact factor: 5.531